Literature DB >> 16892696

Retrospective study of the effect of skeletal complications on total medical care costs in patients with bone metastases of breast cancer seen in typical clinical practice.

Thomas Delea1, James McKiernan, Jane Brandman, John Edelsberg, Jennifer Sung, Monika Raut, Gerry Oster.   

Abstract

Intravenous bisphosphonates are effective in reducing the incidence of skeletal-related events (SREs) in women with bone metastases of breast cancer. The cost-effectiveness of such therapy depends in part on the potential cost savings achieved by preventing these events. However, estimates of the costs of SREs in women with bone metastases of breast cancer in typical US clinical practice are unavailable. The purpose of this study was to estimate the treatment costs of clinically significant SREs and the impact of these events on total medical care costs in patients with bone metastases of breast cancer. Data were gathered from a large US health insurance claims database. Patients with bone metastases of breast cancer who experienced one or more clinically significant SREs in typical clinical practice were matched to similar patients without SREs based on propensity scores. Kaplan-Meier estimated total medical care costs were compared over 60 months for propensity-matched samples of patients with SREs and without SREs. We identified 617 patients with breast cancer and bone metastases, including 321 (52%) with > or = 1 clinically significant SRE. After matching, there were 201 patients each in the SRE and no-SRE groups, with mean follow-up of 13.8 and 11.0 months, respectively. In the SRE group, costs of treatment of SREs were $13,940 (95% CI, $11,240-$16,856) per patient. Total medical care costs were $48,173 (95% CI, $19,068-$77,684) greater in SRE versus no-SRE patients (P = 0.001). The costs of clinically significant SREs in patients with breast cancer and bone metastases seen in typical clinical practice are substantial. Treatments that reduce the incidence of SREs, such as intravenous bisphosphonates, should reduce these costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16892696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Support Oncol        ISSN: 1544-6794


  28 in total

Review 1.  Bone-targeted therapy in metastatic breast cancer - all well-established knowledge?

Authors:  Simon P Gampenrieder; Gabriel Rinnerthaler; Richard Greil
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Zoledronic acid as compared with observation in multiple myeloma patients at biochemical relapse: results of the randomized AZABACHE Spanish trial.

Authors:  Ramón García-Sanz; Albert Oriol; María J Moreno; Javier de la Rubia; Angel R Payer; Miguel T Hernández; Luis Palomera; Ana I Teruel; María J Blanchard; Mercedes Gironella; Paz Ribas; Joan Bargay; Eugenia Abellá; Miquel Granell; Enrique M Ocio; Josep M Ribera; Jesús F San Miguel; María V Mateos
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Treatment of Bone Metastases in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Michael Gnant; Marija Balic; Edgar Petru; Wolfgang Raunik; Christian F Singer; Guenther G Steger; Ingeborg M Watzke; Thomas Brodowicz
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  The burden of symptomatic skeletal events in castrate-resistant prostate cancer patients with bone metastases at three Canadian uro-oncology centres.

Authors:  Fred Saad; Neil E Fleshner; Alan So; Jacques Le Lorier; Louise Perrault; Melanie Poulin-Costello; Raina Rogoza; Ewan J D Robson
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Cost-effectiveness of zoledronic acid in the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases secondary to advanced renal cell carcinoma: application to France, Germany, and the United Kingdom.

Authors:  M F Botteman; M Meijboom; I Foley; J M Stephens; Y M Chen; S Kaura
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2010-08-31

Review 6.  Zoledronic acid: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the management of bone metastases.

Authors:  Kate McKeage; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Health resource utilisation associated with skeletal-related events in European patients with lung cancer: Α subgroup analysis from a prospective multinational study.

Authors:  Vito Lorusso; Ignacio Duran; Cristina Garzon-Rodriguez; Diana Lüftner; Amit Bahl; John Ashcroft; Guy Hechmati; Rachel Wei; Emma Thomas; Herbert Hoefeler
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-27

Review 8.  Reducing the burden of bone metastases: current concepts and treatment options.

Authors:  Roger von Moos; Cora Sternberg; Jean-Jacques Body; Carsten Bokemeyer
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Burden of illness of bone metastases in prostate cancer patients in Québec, Canada: A population-based analysis.

Authors:  Louise Perrault; Vincent Fradet; Véronique Lauzon; Jacques LeLorier; Dominic Mitchell; Mohdhar Habib
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 10.  Bone matters in lung cancer.

Authors:  T Brodowicz; K O'Byrne; C Manegold
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 32.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.