Literature DB >> 1689233

Constraints on representational change: evidence from children's drawing.

A Karmiloff-Smith1.   

Abstract

This paper uses children's drawing as clues to general constraints on internal representational change and flexibility. Fifty-four children between 4 and 11 years of age each produced six drawings. They were first asked to draw a house, and then to draw a house that does not exist. The same procedure was used for man and animal. The technique forced children into operating on their normal, efficient drawing procedures, and allowed the researcher to ascertain the types of constraint that obtain on representational change and flexibility. Striking developmental differences emerged between the 4- to 6-year-old age group and the 8- to 10-year-old age group. Changes introduced by the younger children involved deletions and changes in size and shape, whereas older children changed position and orientation of elements and added elements from other conceptual categories, resulting in ever-increasing inter-representational flexibility. Development is accounted for in terms of reiterated cycles of change from internal representations specified as a sequentially fixed list, embodying a constraint that was inherent in the earlier procedural representations, to internal representations specified as a structured, yet flexibly ordered set of manipulable features. The constraints are considered to be general and are compared with work on seriation and number in children, and on phonological awareness and musical ability in adults. The results are integrated into a general model of developmental change which is compatible both with initial modularity and with subsequent domain-general constraints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1689233     DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90031-e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  19 in total

1.  Chronometric comparisons of imagery to action: visualizing versus physically performing springboard dives.

Authors:  Catherine L Reed
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-12

2.  Commonalities and differences in similarity comparisons.

Authors:  A B Markman; D Gentner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-03

3.  The role of graded category structure in imaginative thought.

Authors:  Thomas B Ward; Merryl J Patterson; Cynthia M Sifonis; Rebecca A Dodds; Katherine N Saunders
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-03

4.  Brief Report: Imaginative Drawing in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Learning Disabilities.

Authors:  Melissa L Allen; Eleanore Craig
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2016-02

5.  Common Object Representations for Visual Production and Recognition.

Authors:  Judith E Fan; Daniel L K Yamins; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-08-20

6.  Creativity and imagination in autism and Asperger syndrome.

Authors:  J Craig; S Baron-Cohen
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  1999-08

7.  Integrating across episodes: Investigating the long-term accessibility of self-derived knowledge in 4-year-old children.

Authors:  Nicole L Varga; Rebekah A Stewart; Patricia J Bauer
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2016-01-08

8.  Brief report: new evidence for a social-specific imagination deficit in children with autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Kayla D Ten Eycke; Ulrich Müller
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2015-01

9.  The haptic recognition of geometrical shapes in congenitally blind and blindfolded adolescents: is there a haptic prototype effect?

Authors:  Anne Theurel; Stéphanie Frileux; Yvette Hatwell; Edouard Gentaz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Preschool Drawing and School Mathematics: The Nature of the Association.

Authors:  Margherita Malanchini; Maria G Tosto; Victoria Garfield; Aysegul Dirik; Adrian Czerwik; Rosalind Arden; Sergey Malykh; Yulia Kovas
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2016-04-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.