Literature DB >> 1689107

Statistical evaluation of diagnostic criteria for bacterial vaginosis.

J L Thomason1, S M Gelbart, R J Anderson, A K Walt, P J Osypowski, F F Broekhuizen.   

Abstract

Bacterial vaginosis is the most common cause of vaginitis in women of reproductive age. In an attempt to clarify diagnosis of this condition, various parameters of signs and symptoms and groups of parameters were compared with classical diagnostic criteria in 310 patients. There was no significant difference in positive diagnosis rates between the Amsel et al. criteria and those of Thomason et al. (p = 0.25). The single most reliable indicator of bacterial vaginosis was the presence of clue cells on wet mount examination of vaginal secretions (sensitivity 98.2%, specificity 94.3%, positive predictive value 89.9%, negative predictive value 99.0%). The best two combinations of parameters for rapid accurate clinical diagnosis were clue cells and odor on alkalinization (sensitivity 99.5%) positive predictive value 98.8%, negative predictive value 92.1%). Gram stain criteria (bacterial morphologic types) were less accurate predictors of the disease (sensitivity 97.0%, specificity 66.2%, positive value 57.2%, negative predictive value 97.9%). Even when the bacterial morphologic type criteria were combined with presence of clue cells, predictive accuracy did not exceed that of clue cells on wet mount examination alone (sensitivity 93.9%, specificity 84.7%, positive predictive value 74.2%, negative predictive value 96.8%). Homogeneous discharge was found to be of little diagnostic value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1689107     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)90839-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  23 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial vaginosis: a diagnostic approach.

Authors:  C S Easmon; P E Hay; C A Ison
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1992-04

2.  Bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  F Keane; C A Ison; H Noble; C Estcourt
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 3.  Bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  C A Spiegel
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Clinical, microbiological, and biochemical factors in recurrent bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  R L Cook; V Redondo-Lopez; C Schmitt; C Meriwether; J D Sobel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and vaginal flora changes in peri- and postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Sabina Cauci; Silvia Driussi; Davide De Santo; Paola Penacchioni; Teresa Iannicelli; Paolo Lanzafame; Francesco De Seta; Franco Quadrifoglio; Domenico de Aloysio; Secondo Guaschino
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Bacterial vaginosis: prevalence in an Italian population of asymptomatic pregnant women and diagnostic aspects.

Authors:  L Cristiano; S Rampello; C Noris; V Valota
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Vaginal symptoms of unknown aetiology: a study in Dutch general practice.

Authors:  J H Dekker; A J Boeke; J Janssens; J T Van Eijk
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and correlation of clinical to Gram stain diagnostic criteria in low risk pregnant women.

Authors:  E Gratacós; F Figueras; M Barranco; R Ros; A Andreu; P L Alonso; V Cararach
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 8.082

9.  Evaluation of a point-of-care test, BVBlue, and clinical and laboratory criteria for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  C S Bradshaw; A N Morton; S M Garland; L B Horvath; I Kuzevska; C K Fairley
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Bacterial vaginosis: an overview for 2009.

Authors:  Charles H Livengood
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.