Literature DB >> 16890854

Endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest for femoral to below the knee arterial bypass using saphenous vein graft.

Leo M Gazoni1, Rebecca Carty, John Skinner, Kenneth J Cherry, Nancy L Harthun, Irving L Kron, Curtis G Tribble, John A Kern.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the use of endoscopic vein harvest (EVH) in coronary artery bypass grafting is accepted, few studies have documented the implementation of EVH in peripheral vascular disease surgery. We hypothesized that EVH improves outcomes compared with open vein harvest (OVH) in patients undergoing femoral to below the knee arterial bypass surgery.
METHODS: The charts of 144 consecutive patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass surgery over the course of 27 months were reviewed. A femoral to below the knee arterial bypass with saphenous vein was done in 88 patients (29 had EVH, 59 had OVH). The preoperative characteristics evaluated were age, gender, renal function, history of diabetes, hypertension, tobacco use, and previous infrainguinal bypass surgery on the affected side. End points included wound complications, length of hospital stay, operative time, angiographic and operative interventions for graft occlusion, patency rates, limb salvage, acute renal failure, myocardial infarction, and death.
RESULTS: Patient characteristics and demographics were similar in the EVH and OVH groups. No operative intervention for occlusion was required in the EVH group (0/29) compared with 13.4% in the OVH group (8/59) (P = .03). At the mean follow-up time of 21 months, primary patency rate was 92.8% in the EVH group and 80.6% in the OVH group (P = .12). No significant differences were found between the EVH and OVH groups in postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, operative time, patency rates, limb salvage, and death.
CONCLUSION: Despite our initial concerns of damaging the venous conduit with a minimally invasive approach to saphenous vein harvest, EVH in our experience has resulted in a trend toward improved patency rates and decreased infectious wound complications while affording the benefit of improved cosmesis. An endoscopic approach results in smaller incisions, decreased interventions for occlusion, and improved outcomes compared with OVH. EVH is the procedure of choice for harvesting saphenous vein for femoral to below the knee arterial bypass surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16890854     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.03.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  3 in total

Review 1.  Bypass surgery for lower extremity limb salvage: vein bypass.

Authors:  Hosam F El-Sayed
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec

2.  Endoscopic versus open saphenous vein graft harvest for lower extremity bypass in critical limb ischemia.

Authors:  Raymond E Eid; Li Wang; Michael Kuzman; Ghassan Abu-Hamad; Michael Singh; Luke K Marone; Steven A Leers; Rabih A Chaer
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  The use of minimally invasive videoscopic technique in large vessel and cardiac surgery. Does the potentially increased difficulty bring benefits to the patient?

Authors:  Maciej Rachwalik; Tomasz Płonek; Wojciech Kustrzycki; Przemysław Szyber; Stanisław Pawłowski; Waldemar Goździk
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 1.195

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.