Literature DB >> 16890268

Environmental impact of a coal combustion-desulphurisation plant: abatement capacity of desulphurisation process and environmental characterisation of combustion by-products.

E Alvarez-Ayuso1, X Querol, A Tomás.   

Abstract

The fate of trace elements in a combustion power plant equipped with a wet limestone flue gas desulphurisation (FGD) installation was studied in order to evaluate its emission abatement capacity. With this aim representative samples of feed coal, boiler slag, fly ash, limestone, FGD gypsum and FGD process water and wastewater were analysed for major and trace elements using the following techniques: inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES), ion chromatography (IC), ion selective electrode (ISE) and atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS). Mass balances were established allowing to determine the element partitioning behaviour. It was found that, together with S, Hg, Cl, F, Se and As were those elements entering in the FGD plant primarily as gaseous species. The abatement capacity of the FGD plant for such elements offered values ranged from 96% to 100% for As, Cl, F, S and Se, and about 60% for Hg. The environmental characterisation of combustion by-products (boiler slag, fly ash and FGD gypsum) were also established according to the Council Decision 2003/33/EC on waste disposal. To this end, water leaching tests (EN-12457-4) were performed, analysing the elements with environmental concern by means of the aforementioned techniques. According to the leaching behaviour of combustion by-products studied, these could be disposed of in landfills for non-hazardous wastes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16890268     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.06.070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  5 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in flue gas desulfurization gypsum processes and applications - A review.

Authors:  Nadeesha H Koralegedara; Patricio X Pinto; Dionysios D Dionysiou; Souhail R Al-Abed
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 6.789

2.  Elemental properties of coal slag and measured airborne exposures at two coal slag processing facilities.

Authors:  Christopher Mugford; Randy Boylstein; Jenna L Gibbs
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Cadmium contamination in Tianjin agricultural soils and sediments: relative importance of atmospheric deposition from coal combustion.

Authors:  Guanghong Wu; Cancan Yang; Lan Guo; Zhongliang Wang
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 4.609

4.  Comparison of the Characteristics of Fly Ash Generated from Bio and Municipal Waste: Fluidized Bed Incinerators.

Authors:  Mudassar Azam; Saman Setoodeh Jahromy; Waseem Raza; Florian Wesenauer; Karolina Schwendtner; Franz Winter
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Combined Superbase Ionic Liquid Approach to Separate CO2 from Flue Gas.

Authors:  Adam J Greer; S F Rebecca Taylor; Helen Daly; Johan Jacquemin; Christopher Hardacre
Journal:  ACS Sustain Chem Eng       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 9.224

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.