OBJECTIVE: Examine the incidence of positive intradermal tests after a negative skin prick test for 24 inhalant antigens. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective study. Charts from patients who underwent modified quantitative testing (MQT) over a 3-year period were reviewed. Patients were initially tested with Multi-Test II. Subjects with negative wheals to a specific allergen were then tested with a 1:500 weight:volume intradermal injection of that allergen. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-three patients underwent MQT for 24 antigens. Allergens with the highest incidence of positive intradermal wheals after negative prick testing were Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Dermatophagoides farinae at 26.67%. Allergens with elevated incidence of positive intradermals included fusarium, cockroach, cocklebur, rough marsh elder, and ragweed, all with incidences of 16% to 19%. CONCLUSION: Positive intradermal responses after negative prick testing occur commonly. Future study is needed to determine the generalizability and clinical significance of these findings. EBM RATING: C-4.
OBJECTIVE: Examine the incidence of positive intradermal tests after a negative skin prick test for 24 inhalant antigens. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective study. Charts from patients who underwent modified quantitative testing (MQT) over a 3-year period were reviewed. Patients were initially tested with Multi-Test II. Subjects with negative wheals to a specific allergen were then tested with a 1:500 weight:volume intradermal injection of that allergen. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-three patients underwent MQT for 24 antigens. Allergens with the highest incidence of positive intradermal wheals after negative prick testing were Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Dermatophagoides farinae at 26.67%. Allergens with elevated incidence of positive intradermals included fusarium, cockroach, cocklebur, rough marsh elder, and ragweed, all with incidences of 16% to 19%. CONCLUSION: Positive intradermal responses after negative prick testing occur commonly. Future study is needed to determine the generalizability and clinical significance of these findings. EBM RATING: C-4.
Authors: Denisa Ferastraoaru; Maria Shtessel; Elizabeth Lobell; Golda Hudes; David Rosenstreich; Gabriele de Vos Journal: Allergy Rhinol (Providence) Date: 2017-06-01