Literature DB >> 16889836

A rationale for lowering the blood lead action level from 10 to 2 microg/dL.

Steven G Gilbert1, Bernard Weiss.   

Abstract

Fifteen years ago, in 1991, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) established 10 microg/dL as the lowest level of concern for children's blood lead levels. This value is extremely important because, historically, policy makers and public health officials generally have acted to remove sources of lead exposure only after the CDC's level of concern had been exceeded. A growing body of evidence, however, reveals that blood lead levels below 10 microg/dL may impair neurobehavioral development. There is now sufficient and compelling scientific evidence for the CDC to lower the blood lead action level in children. This review argues that a level of 2 microg/dL is a useful and feasible replacement. Although it can be argued, in turn, that no threshold for the health effects of lead is demonstrable, analytically a blood level of 2 microg/dL is readily and accurately measured and provides a benchmark for successful prevention. Lowering the level of concern would encourage and accelerate the investments needed to ensure that children are protected from lead exposure in their homes, schools, and play settings. Such a program would also offer economic advantages because of the coupling between lead, educational attainment, earnings and anti-social conduct. By lowering the blood action level, CDC will promote policies and initiatives designed to further reduce children's exposure to this potent developmental neurotoxicant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16889836      PMCID: PMC2212280          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuro.2006.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurotoxicology        ISSN: 0161-813X            Impact factor:   4.294


  39 in total

1.  Exposure to lead in children--how low is low enough?

Authors:  Walter J Rogan; James H Ware
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Blood lead concentration and delayed puberty in girls.

Authors:  Sherry G Selevan; Deborah C Rice; Karen A Hogan; Susan Y Euling; Andrea Pfahles-Hutchens; James Bethel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Studying toxicants as single chemicals: does this strategy adequately identify neurotoxic risk?

Authors:  Deborah A Cory-Slechta
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.294

Review 4.  Ethical, legal, and social issues: our children's future.

Authors:  Steven G Gilbert
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 4.294

5.  The health effects of low level exposure to lead.

Authors:  H L Needleman; D Bellinger
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 21.981

6.  Lead and minor hearing impairment.

Authors:  J Schwartz; D Otto
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct

Review 7.  Childhood lead poisoning: the promise and abandonment of primary prevention.

Authors:  H L Needleman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Environmental lead and children's intelligence: a systematic review of the epidemiological evidence.

Authors:  S J Pocock; M Smith; P Baghurst
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-11-05

9.  Low-level environmental lead exposure and children's intellectual function: an international pooled analysis.

Authors:  Bruce P Lanphear; Richard Hornung; Jane Khoury; Kimberly Yolton; Peter Baghurst; David C Bellinger; Richard L Canfield; Kim N Dietrich; Robert Bornschein; Tom Greene; Stephen J Rothenberg; Herbert L Needleman; Lourdes Schnaas; Gail Wasserman; Joseph Graziano; Russell Roberts
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Ethics assessment as an adjunct to risk assessment in the evaluation of developmental neurotoxicants.

Authors:  B Weiss
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  88 in total

1.  Arkansas People Participating in Lead Education (APPLE): results of a lead-safe training program.

Authors:  Alesia Ferguson; Zoran Bursac; David F Kern
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2011-06

2.  Lead (Pb) in biota and perceptions of Pb exposure at a recently designated Superfund beach site in New Jersey.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld; Christian Jeitner; Mark Donio; Taryn Pittfield
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2012

3.  Mechanisms of lead and manganese neurotoxicity.

Authors:  April P Neal; Tomas R Guilarte
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.524

4.  Response to: "What is the meaning of non-linear dose-response relationships between blood lead concentrations and IQ?".

Authors:  Todd A Jusko; David W Lockhart; Paul D Sampson; Charles R Henderson; Richard L Canfield
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 4.294

Review 5.  Same sex, no sex, and unaware sex in neurotoxicology.

Authors:  Bernard Weiss
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 4.294

6.  The important health impact of where a child lives: neighborhood characteristics and the burden of lead poisoning.

Authors:  Patrick M Vivier; Marissa Hauptman; Sherry H Weitzen; Scott Bell; Daniela N Quilliam; John R Logan
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-11

Review 7.  Multiple risk factors for lead poisoning in Hispanic sub-populations: a review.

Authors:  Ray W Brown; Thomas Longoria
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2009-03-28

8.  Exposure vs toxicity levels of airborne quartz, metal and carbon particles in cast iron foundries.

Authors:  Beatrice Moroni; Cecilia Viti; David Cappelletti
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 5.563

9.  Blood lead concentrations and children's behavioral and emotional problems: a cohort study.

Authors:  Jianghong Liu; Xianchen Liu; Wei Wang; Linda McCauley; Jennifer Pinto-Martin; Yingjie Wang; Linda Li; Chonghuai Yan; Walter J Rogan
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 16.193

10.  A Prospective Birth Cohort Study on Early Childhood Lead Levels and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: New Insight on Sex Differences.

Authors:  Yuelong Ji; Xiumei Hong; Guoying Wang; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Anne W Riley; Li-Ching Lee; Pamela J Surkan; Tami R Bartell; Barry Zuckerman; Xiaobin Wang
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.406

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.