Literature DB >> 16889784

The chemical interpretation and practice of linear solvation energy relationships in chromatography.

Mark Vitha1, Peter W Carr.   

Abstract

This review focuses on the use of linear solvation energy relationships (LSERs) to understand the types and relative strength of the chemical interactions that control retention and selectivity in the various modes of chromatography ranging from gas chromatography to reversed phase and micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography. The most recent, widely accepted symbolic representation of the LSER model, as proposed by Abraham, is given by the equation: SP=c + eE + sS + aA + bB + vV, in which, SP can be any free energy related property. In chromatography, SP is most often taken as logk' where k' is the retention factor. The letters E, S, A, B, and V denote solute dependent input parameters that come from scales related to a solute's polarizability, dipolarity (with some contribution from polarizability), hydrogen bond donating ability, hydrogen bond accepting ability, and molecular size, respectively. The e-, s-, a-, b-, and v-coefficients and the constant, c, are determined via multiparameter linear least squares regression analysis of a data set comprised of solutes with known E, S, A, B, and V values and which span a reasonably wide range in interaction abilities. Thus, LSERs are designed to probe the type and relative importance of the interactions that govern solute retention. In this review, we include a synopsis of the various solvent and solute scales in common use in chromatography. More importantly, we emphasize the development and physico-chemical basis of - and thus meaning of - the solute parameters. After establishing the meaning of the parameters, we discuss their use in LSERs as applied to understanding the intermolecular interactions governing various gas-liquid and liquid-liquid phase equilibria. The gas-liquid partition process is modeled as the sum of an endoergic cavity formation/solvent reorganization process and exoergic solute-solvent attractive forces, whereas the partitioning of a solute between two solvents is thermodynamically equivalent to the difference in two gas/liquid solution processes. We end with a set of recommendations and advisories for conducting LSER studies, stressing the proper chemical and statistical application of the methodology. We intend that these recommendations serve as a guide for future studies involving the execution, statistical evaluation, and chemical interpretation of LSERs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16889784     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.06.074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  31 in total

1.  A soil-column gas chromatography (SCGC) approach to explore the thermal desorption behavior of hydrocarbons from soils.

Authors:  Ying Yu; Liang Liu; Ziying Shao; Tianyu Ju; Bing Sun; Belkacem Benadda
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Evaluation of an amide-based stationary phase for supercritical fluid chromatography.

Authors:  Amaris C Borges-Muñoz; Luis A Colón
Journal:  J Sep Sci       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.645

Review 3.  Fast, comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography.

Authors:  Dwight R Stoll; Xiaoping Li; Xiaoli Wang; Peter W Carr; Sarah E G Porter; Sarah C Rutan
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 4.759

4.  Characterization of a novel pyridinium bromide surface confined ionic liquid stationary phase for high-performance liquid chromatography under normal phase conditions via linear solvation energy relationships.

Authors:  D S Van Meter; O D Stuart; A B Carle; A M Stalcup
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 4.759

5.  Could linear solvation energy relationships give insights into chiral recognition mechanisms? 2. Characterization of macrocyclic glycopeptide stationary phases.

Authors:  Clifford R Mitchell; Daniel W Armstrong; Alain Berthod
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 4.759

6.  "Retention projection" enables reliable use of shared gas chromatographic retention data across laboratories, instruments, and methods.

Authors:  Brian B Barnes; Michael B Wilson; Peter W Carr; Mark F Vitha; Corey D Broeckling; Adam L Heuberger; Jessica Prenni; Gregory C Janis; Henry Corcoran; Nicholas H Snow; Shilpi Chopra; Ramkumar Dhandapani; Amanda Tawfall; Lloyd W Sumner; Paul G Boswell
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Novel ultra stable silica-based stationary phases for reversed phase liquid chromatography--study of a hydrophobically assisted weak acid cation exchange phase.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Peter W Carr
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 4.759

8.  A practical methodology to measure unbiased gas chromatographic retention factor vs. temperature relationships.

Authors:  Baijie Peng; Mei-Yi Kuo; Panhia Yang; Joshua T Hewitt; Paul G Boswell
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.759

9.  What experimental factors influence the accuracy of retention projections in gas chromatography-mass spectrometry?

Authors:  Michael B Wilson; Brian B Barnes; Paul G Boswell
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 4.759

10.  Synthesis and characterization of silica-based hyper-crosslinked sulfonate-modified reversed stationary phases.

Authors:  Hao Luo; Lianjia Ma; Yu Zhang; Peter W Carr
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 4.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.