Literature DB >> 16889516

Effects of cell seeding density and collagen concentration on contraction kinetics of mesenchymal stem cell-seeded collagen constructs.

Victor S Nirmalanandhan1, Martin S Levy, Anthony J Huth, David L Butler.   

Abstract

Our group has been engineering cell-scaffold constructs to improve tendon repair by contracting mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in collagen gels and then evaluating their repair potential in wound sites in rabbits. Because the construct's initial conditions may influence the ultimate repair outcome, this two-part study sought to distinguish which factors most influence contraction kinetics in culture. (1)We optically determined if varying cell-to-collagen ratio significantly affected construct contraction. Temporal changes in construct area were monitored up to 168 h for 4 cell-to-collagen ratios (HK = 0.04, LK = 0.08, HM = 0.4, and LM = 0.8, where H, L = 2.6, 1.3 mg/mL collagen and K,M = 0.1, 1 million cells/mL, respectively).A mathematical model was created with terms that represent the different combinations of cell densities and collagen concentrations in order to predict the contraction kinetics as a function of time. Highly significant differences in construct areas were found among all 4 ratios after 8 h of contraction with the exception of the LK (0.08) vs. HM(0.4) conditions. This similar pattern raised the question of whether cell density or collagen concentration more influenced these events. (2) To isolate these effects, the contraction kinetics of the HM construct were compared to those of a new construct (L5K) with equivalent cell-to-collagen ratio (0.4) but half the cell density (500 K MSCs/mL) and half the collagen concentration (1.3 mg/mL). The L5K construct contracted significantly faster and more completely than the HM construct but no differently than the LM construct. These results indicate that above a threshold value of cell density, percentage reductions in collagen concentration influence contraction kinetics more than equivalent percentage increases in cell seeding density. The fact that our model successfully predicted intermediate time points of contraction suggests its utility for examining other cell and collagen densities. Controlling scaffold as well as cellular initial conditions will be critical in achieving our goal of functional tissue engineering (FTE) a successful tendon repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16889516     DOI: 10.1089/ten.2006.12.1865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng        ISSN: 1076-3279


  17 in total

1.  The use of mesenchymal stem cells in collagen-based scaffolds for tissue-engineered repair of tendons.

Authors:  David L Butler; Cynthia Gooch; Kirsten R C Kinneberg; Gregory P Boivin; Marc T Galloway; V Sanjit Nirmalanandhan; Jason T Shearn; Nathaniel A Dyment; Natalia Juncosa-Melvin
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular matrix enhances chondrogenic phenotype of and cartilage formation by encapsulated chondrocytes in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Yuanheng Yang; Hang Lin; He Shen; Bing Wang; Guanghua Lei; Rocky S Tuan
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  Fiber development and matrix production in tissue-engineered menisci using bovine mesenchymal stem cells and fibrochondrocytes.

Authors:  Mary Clare McCorry; Lawrence J Bonassar
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.417

4.  Force-driven evolution of mesoscale structure in engineered 3D microtissues and the modulation of tissue stiffening.

Authors:  Ruogang Zhao; Christopher S Chen; Daniel H Reich
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Use of bio-mimetic three-dimensional technology in therapeutics for heart disease.

Authors:  Vahid Serpooshan; Mingming Zhao; Scott A Metzler; Ke Wei; Parisha B Shah; Andrew Wang; Morteza Mahmoudi; Andrey V Malkovskiy; Jayakumar Rajadas; Manish J Butte; Daniel Bernstein; Pilar Ruiz-Lozano
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.269

Review 6.  Perspectives on the role of nanotechnology in bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Eduardo Saiz; Elizabeth A Zimmermann; Janice S Lee; Ulrike G K Wegst; Antoni P Tomsia
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 7.  Evolving strategies in mechanobiology to more effectively treat damaged musculoskeletal tissues.

Authors:  David L Butler; Nathaniel A Dyment; Jason T Shearn; Kirsten R C Kinneberg; Andrew P Breidenbach; Andrea L Lalley; Steven D Gilday; Cynthia Gooch; M B Rao; Chia-feng Liu; Christopher Wylie
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Effects of cell concentration and collagen concentration on contraction kinetics and mechanical properties in a bone marrow stromal cell-collagen construct.

Authors:  Hsiao-Feng Chieh; Yulong Sun; Jiunn-Der Liao; Fong-Chin Su; Chunfeng Zhao; Peter C Amadio; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 4.396

9.  Poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate)/collagen hybrid scaffolds for tissue engineering applications.

Authors:  Alex J Lomas; William R Webb; JianFeng Han; Guo-Qiang Chen; Xun Sun; Zhirong Zhang; Alicia J El Haj; Nicholas R Forsyth
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 3.056

10.  Collagen density significantly affects the functional properties of an engineered provisional scaffold.

Authors:  Eduardo L Abreu; Matthew P Palmer; Martha M Murray
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.