AIM: Monoclonal antibodies against the human homologue of mouse macrosialin, CD68, are generally commercialized as markers for human monocytes and macrophages. Indeed, CD68 is considered as a selective marker for human myeloid cells, although several previous immunohistochemical studies indicate that some antibody clones also react with other hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic cell types. The aim of our study was to verify these observations and to evaluate the reliability of CD68 as a macrophage marker. METHODS: We investigated protein and RNA expression of CD68 in various fibroblast types and carcinoma cell lines as compared to monocytes and macrophages using immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, and specific RT-PCR. Different monoclonal antibody clones against CD68 were applied including KP-1 and EBM11. RESULTS: As expected, the intensity of immunohistochemical and flow cytometric CD68 staining was dependent on both the antibody clone and the fixation procedure. However, fibroblasts isolated from normal skin, normal breast, breast tumor tissue, and osteoarthritis synovia clearly expressed CD68 protein at levels comparable to macrophages. The specificity of CD68 expression in fibroblasts was verified by RT-PCR which also showed some tumor cell types to express CD68 mRNA. CONCLUSION: Our findings clearly demonstrate that the expression of CD68 is not restricted to the macrophage lineage. This is highly relevant for experimental and diagnostic purposes, since anti CD68 antibodies cannot be accepted without reservations for the discrimination of myeloid cells and fibroblasts even in paraffin sections after formalin fixation.
AIM: Monoclonal antibodies against the human homologue of mousemacrosialin, CD68, are generally commercialized as markers for human monocytes and macrophages. Indeed, CD68 is considered as a selective marker for human myeloid cells, although several previous immunohistochemical studies indicate that some antibody clones also react with other hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic cell types. The aim of our study was to verify these observations and to evaluate the reliability of CD68 as a macrophage marker. METHODS: We investigated protein and RNA expression of CD68 in various fibroblast types and carcinoma cell lines as compared to monocytes and macrophages using immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, and specific RT-PCR. Different monoclonal antibody clones against CD68 were applied including KP-1 and EBM11. RESULTS: As expected, the intensity of immunohistochemical and flow cytometric CD68 staining was dependent on both the antibody clone and the fixation procedure. However, fibroblasts isolated from normal skin, normal breast, breast tumor tissue, and osteoarthritis synovia clearly expressed CD68 protein at levels comparable to macrophages. The specificity of CD68 expression in fibroblasts was verified by RT-PCR which also showed some tumor cell types to express CD68 mRNA. CONCLUSION: Our findings clearly demonstrate that the expression of CD68 is not restricted to the macrophage lineage. This is highly relevant for experimental and diagnostic purposes, since anti CD68 antibodies cannot be accepted without reservations for the discrimination of myeloid cells and fibroblasts even in paraffin sections after formalin fixation.
Authors: Brian Ruffell; Alfred Au; Hope S Rugo; Laura J Esserman; E Shelley Hwang; Lisa M Coussens Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-08-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Amanda W Bridges; Rachel E Whitmire; Neetu Singh; Kellie L Templeman; Julia E Babensee; L Andrew Lyon; Andrés J García Journal: J Biomed Mater Res A Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 4.396
Authors: Masaru Suzuki; Marc A Sze; Joshua D Campbell; John F Brothers; Marc E Lenburg; John E McDonough; W Mark Elliott; Joel D Cooper; Avrum Spira; James C Hogg Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-08-25 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Cheng Zhou; Mahmoud R Moustafa; Liji Cao; Mark Kriegsmann; Martin Winter; Christian Schwager; Bleddyn Jones; Shijun Wang; Tobias Bäuerle; Ping-Kun Zhou; Martina Schnölzer; Wilko Weichert; Juergen Debus; Amir Abdollahi Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2019-01-11 Impact factor: 7.396