Literature DB >> 16888756

Can anti-migratory drugs be screened in vitro? A review of 2D and 3D assays for the quantitative analysis of cell migration.

Christine Decaestecker1, Olivier Debeir, Philippe Van Ham, Robert Kiss.   

Abstract

The aim of the present review is to detail and analyze the pros and cons of in vitro tests available to quantify the anti-migratory effects of anti-cancer drugs for their eventual use in combating the dispersal of tumor cells, a clinical need which currently remains unsatisfied. We therefore briefly sum up why anti-migratory drugs constitute a promising approach in oncology while at the same time emphasizing that migrating cancer cells are resistant to apoptosis. To analyze the pros and cons of the various in vitro tests under review we also briefly sum up the molecular and cellular stages of cancer cell migration, an approach that enables us to argue both that no single in vitro test is sufficient to characterize the anti-migratory potential of a drug and that standardization is needed for the efficient quantitative analysis of cell locomotion in a 3D environment. Before concluding our review we devote the final two parts (i) to the description of new prototypes which, in the near future, could enter the screening process with a view to identifying novel anti-migratory compounds, and (ii) to the anti-migratory compounds currently developed against cancer, with particular emphasis on how these compounds were selected before entering the clinical trial phase. (c) 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 16888756     DOI: 10.1002/med.20078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Res Rev        ISSN: 0198-6325            Impact factor:   12.944


  45 in total

1.  A porous 3D cell culture micro device for cell migration study.

Authors:  Liang Ma; Changchun Zhou; Biaoyang Lin; Wei Li
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.838

Review 2.  Mechanical stretching for tissue engineering: two-dimensional and three-dimensional constructs.

Authors:  Brandon D Riehl; Jae-Hong Park; Il Keun Kwon; Jung Yul Lim
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 6.389

3.  Design and interpretation of cell trajectory assays.

Authors:  Lucie G Bowden; Matthew J Simpson; Ruth E Baker
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  In vitro cell migration quantification method for scratch assays.

Authors:  Ana Victoria Ponce Bobadilla; Jazmine Arévalo; Eduard Sarró; Helen M Byrne; Philip K Maini; Thomas Carraro; Simone Balocco; Anna Meseguer; Tomás Alarcón
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 5.  Marine Mollusk-Derived Agents with Antiproliferative Activity as Promising Anticancer Agents to Overcome Chemotherapy Resistance.

Authors:  Maria Letizia Ciavatta; Florence Lefranc; Marianna Carbone; Ernesto Mollo; Margherita Gavagnin; Tania Betancourt; Ramesh Dasari; Alexander Kornienko; Robert Kiss
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 12.944

6.  Quantifying the roles of cell motility and cell proliferation in a circular barrier assay.

Authors:  Matthew J Simpson; Katrina K Treloar; Benjamin J Binder; Parvathi Haridas; Kerry J Manton; David I Leavesley; D L Sean McElwain; Ruth E Baker
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 7.  Established and novel methods of interrogating two-dimensional cell migration.

Authors:  William J Ashby; Andries Zijlstra
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  Enhanced ovarian cancer tumorigenesis and metastasis by the macrophage colony-stimulating factor.

Authors:  Eugene P Toy; Masoud Azodi; Nancy L Folk; Christina M Zito; Caroline J Zeiss; Setsuko K Chambers
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.715

9.  Src family kinases mediate betel quid-induced oral cancer cell motility and could be a biomarker for early invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jeff Yi-Fu Chen; Chih-Chang Hung; Kai-Lieh Huang; Yi-Ting Chen; Shyun-Yeu Liu; Wei-Fan Chiang; Hau-Ren Chen; Ching-Yu Yen; Yu-Jen Wu; Jenq-Yuh Ko; Yuh-Shan Jou
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 10.  Galectins and gliomas.

Authors:  Marie Le Mercier; Shannon Fortin; Véronique Mathieu; Robert Kiss; Florence Lefranc
Journal:  Brain Pathol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 6.508

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.