INTRODUCTION: Nutritional support has been demonstrated to improve recovery from radical cystectomy, but is expensive and when used inappropriately may actually increase the costs and morbidity of surgery. We sought to establish national patterns of practice with regard to feeding following cystectomy in the UK. AIMS AND METHODS: Following consultation with the specialist nutrition team, a questionnaire was designed to investigate the feeding strategy after cystectomy and dispatched by post to all UK urologists. RESULTS: The majority (60%) of respondents employed a traditional strategy of resting the bowel and feeding orally after bowel recovery. A minority used either early total parenteral nutrition (TPN; 18.5%) or enteral nutrition (6.5%), but a larger proportion (29%) felt enteral nutrition was the 'optimal' feeding regime. Only 30% used guidelines and 52% felt trials would help to establish a nutrition strategy following cystectomy. CONCLUSION: There is little evidence that TPN improves the outcome of cystectomy and it may actually increase morbidity and costs, whereas enteral nutrition may improve recovery. Despite this evidence TPN is widely used by urologists whereas enteral nutrition is used infrequently. Implementation of an evidence-based feeding regime after cystectomy is likely to reduce the morbidity and financial costs of cystectomy.
INTRODUCTION: Nutritional support has been demonstrated to improve recovery from radical cystectomy, but is expensive and when used inappropriately may actually increase the costs and morbidity of surgery. We sought to establish national patterns of practice with regard to feeding following cystectomy in the UK. AIMS AND METHODS: Following consultation with the specialist nutrition team, a questionnaire was designed to investigate the feeding strategy after cystectomy and dispatched by post to all UK urologists. RESULTS: The majority (60%) of respondents employed a traditional strategy of resting the bowel and feeding orally after bowel recovery. A minority used either early total parenteral nutrition (TPN; 18.5%) or enteral nutrition (6.5%), but a larger proportion (29%) felt enteral nutrition was the 'optimal' feeding regime. Only 30% used guidelines and 52% felt trials would help to establish a nutrition strategy following cystectomy. CONCLUSION: There is little evidence that TPN improves the outcome of cystectomy and it may actually increase morbidity and costs, whereas enteral nutrition may improve recovery. Despite this evidence TPN is widely used by urologists whereas enteral nutrition is used infrequently. Implementation of an evidence-based feeding regime after cystectomy is likely to reduce the morbidity and financial costs of cystectomy.
Authors: Peter Declercq; Gunter De Win; Frank Van der Aa; Elodie Beels; Beels Elodie; Lorenz Van der Linden; Hendrik Van Poppel; Ludo Willems; Willems Ludo; Isabel Spriet; Spriet Isabel Journal: Int J Clin Pharm Date: 2015-02-10