Literature DB >> 16888381

NIH Stroke Scale reliability in ratings from a large sample of clinicians.

S Andrew Josephson1, Nancy K Hills, S Claiborne Johnston.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is widely used in stroke clinical care and trials. Certification in its use, most commonly through rating of video vignettes, is routinely required. To investigate the reliability of the NIHSS in a representative sample of raters, we examined the results of the most frequently used certification examination.
METHODS: At the invitation of the National Stroke Association, we analyzed the results of all raters who completed one of two multiple patient videotaped certification examinations from 1998 to 2004. Total scores for each vignette were calculated and ratings were compared based on percentile of responses and modified kappa scores.
RESULTS: There were 7,405 unique raters with 38,148 individual NIHSS item responses; median scores for each vignette ranged from 0 to 31. Total NIHSS scores varied widely between raters; scoring for 7 of the 11 patients (64%) had a four or more point difference in NIHSS score from the 5th to 95th percentile. The aphasia (kappa = 0.60) and facial palsy (0.65) items on the test contributed most to the variance in the total NIHSS score. Nurses agreed with the most common response on scoring more frequently than physicians (p < 0.0001). Taking the certification examination multiple times did not improve agreement.
CONCLUSIONS: In a large diverse sample of clinicians, inter-rater reliability for individual elements of the NIHSS on videotaped vignettes was generally good, but overall scoring was inconsistent and could impact clinical trial results. Whether additional training, modification of examination elements, or clearer definitions for scoring could improve reliability requires further study. Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16888381     DOI: 10.1159/000094857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis        ISSN: 1015-9770            Impact factor:   2.762


  36 in total

1.  What change in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale should define neurologic deterioration in acute ischemic stroke?

Authors:  James E Siegler; Amelia K Boehme; Andre D Kumar; Michael A Gillette; Karen C Albright; Sheryl Martin-Schild
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.136

2.  Association of plasma trimethylamine-N-oxide levels with post-stroke cognitive impairment: a 1-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  Chen Zhu; Guangzong Li; Zhiyu Lv; Jing Li; Xiangming Wang; Jie Kang; Cheng Zhan
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Predictive value of the combination of lesion location and volume of ischemic infarction with rehabilitation outcomes.

Authors:  Chen Lin; Neil Chatterjee; Jungwha Lee; Richard Harvey; Shyam Prabhakaran
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Revisiting 'progressive stroke': incidence, predictors, pathophysiology, and management of unexplained early neurological deterioration following acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Pierre Seners; Jean-Claude Baron
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  The Neurological Outcome Scale for Traumatic Brain Injury (NOS-TBI): II. Reliability and convergent validity.

Authors:  Stephen R McCauley; Elisabeth A Wilde; Tara M Kelly; Annie M Weyand; Ragini Yallampalli; Eric J Waldron; Claudia Pedroza; Kathleen P Schnelle; Corwin Boake; Harvey S Levin; Paolo Moretti
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Feasibility of the Neurological Outcome Scale for Traumatic Brain Injury (NOS-TBI) in adults.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Wilde; Stephen R McCauley; Tara M Kelly; Harvey S Levin; Claudia Pedroza; Guy L Clifton; Claudia S Robertson; Alex B Valadka; Paolo Moretti
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Predicting Domain-Specific Health-Related Quality of Life Using Acute Infarct Volume.

Authors:  Chen Lin; Jungwha Lee; Neil Chatterjee; Carlos Corado; Timothy Carroll; Andrew Naidech; Shyam Prabhakaran
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Is the NIHSS certification process too lenient?

Authors:  Nancy K Hills; S Andrew Josephson; Patrick D Lyden; S Claiborne Johnston
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 2.762

9.  Ethnic disparities trump other risk factors in determining delay to emergency department arrival in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  James E Siegler; Amelia K Boehme; Karen C Albright; Sheryl Martin-Schild
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.847

10.  Neurofluctuation in patients with subcortical ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Farhaan S Vahidy; William J Hicks; Indrani Acosta; Hen Hallevi; Hui Peng; Renganayaki Pandurengan; Nicole R Gonzales; Andrew D Barreto; Sheryl Martin-Schild; Tzu-Ching Wu; Mohammad H Rahbar; Arvind B Bambhroliya; James C Grotta; Sean I Savitz
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 9.910

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.