Literature DB >> 16888061

Unraveling the mechanical properties of composite silk threads spun by cribellate orb-weaving spiders.

Todd A Blackledge1, Cheryl Y Hayashi.   

Abstract

Orb-web weaving spiders depend upon the mechanical performance of capture threads to absorb the energy of flying prey. Most orb-weavers spin wet capture threads with core fibers of flagelliform silk. These threads are extremely compliant and extensible due to the folding of their constituent proteins into molecular nanosprings and hydration by a surrounding coating of aqueous glue. In contrast, other orb-weavers use cribellate capture threads, which are composite structures consisting of core fibers of pseudoflagelliform silk surrounded by a matrix of fine dry cribellar fibrils. Based on phylogenetic evidence, cribellate capture threads predate the use of viscid capture threads. To better characterize how pseudoflagelliform and cribellar fibrils function, we investigated the mechanical performance of cribellate capture threads for three genera of spiders (Deinopis, Hyptiotes and Uloborus). These taxa spin very diverse web architectures, ranging from complete orbs to evolutionarily reduced triangle webs and cast nets. We found that the pseudoflagelliform core fibers of these webs were stiffer and stronger, but also less extensible, than flagelliform silk. However, cribellate capture threads achieved overall high extensibilities because the surrounding cribellar fibrils contributed substantially to the tensile performance of threads long after the core pseudoflagelliform fibers ruptured. In the case of Deinopis capture threads, up to 90% of the total work performed could be attributed to these fibrils. These findings yield insight into the evolutionary transition from cribellate to viscid capture threads.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16888061     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  21 in total

1.  Tangled in a sparse spider web: single origin of orb weavers and their spinning work unravelled by denser taxonomic sampling.

Authors:  Dimitar Dimitrov; Lara Lopardo; Gonzalo Giribet; Miquel A Arnedo; Fernando Alvarez-Padilla; Gustavo Hormiga
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  High-performance spider webs: integrating biomechanics, ecology and behaviour.

Authors:  Aaron M T Harmer; Todd A Blackledge; Joshua S Madin; Marie E Herberstein
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Reconstructing web evolution and spider diversification in the molecular era.

Authors:  Todd A Blackledge; Nikolaj Scharff; Jonathan A Coddington; Tamas Szüts; John W Wenzel; Cheryl Y Hayashi; Ingi Agnarsson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The role of capture spiral silk properties in the diversification of orb webs.

Authors:  Anna Tarakanova; Markus J Buehler
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Adhesion of dry and wet electrostatic capture silk of uloborid spider.

Authors:  Hervé Elettro; Sébastien Neukirch; Arnaud Antkowiak; Fritz Vollrath
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2015-07-07

6.  Punctuated evolution of viscid silk in spider orb webs supported by mechanical behavior of wet cribellate silk.

Authors:  Dakota Piorkowski; Todd A Blackledge
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-07-27

7.  Adhesion enhancement of cribellate capture threads by epicuticular waxes of the insect prey sheds new light on spider web evolution.

Authors:  Raya A Bott; Werner Baumgartner; Peter Bräunig; Florian Menzel; Anna-Christin Joel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Post-secretion processing influences spider silk performance.

Authors:  Sean J Blamires; Chung-Lin Wu; Todd A Blackledge; I-Min Tso
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  The expression of genes coding for distinct types of glycine-rich proteins varies according to the biology of three metastriate ticks, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, Rhipicephalus sanguineus and Amblyomma cajennense.

Authors:  Sandra R Maruyama; Elen Anatriello; Jennifer M Anderson; José M Ribeiro; Lucinda G Brandão; Jesus G Valenzuela; Beatriz R Ferreira; Gustavo R Garcia; Matias Pj Szabó; Sonal Patel; Richard Bishop; Isabel Kf de Miranda-Santos
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Recombinant Dragline Silk-Like Proteins-Expression and Purification.

Authors:  William A Gaines; William R Marcotte
Journal:  AATCC Rev       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 0.111

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.