Literature DB >> 16887784

Gender effects on reaction time variability and trial-to-trial performance: reply to Deary and Der (2005).

Stian Reimers1, Elizabeth A Maylor.   

Abstract

Deary and Der (2005) reported significant gender effects on intraindividual variability in choice reaction time (CRT), and suggested several potential causes. In their procedure it was not possible to examine RTs on a trial-to-trial basis. We therefore investigate an additional possible cause: that men and women differ in their rate of performance improvement across trials, creating an apparent difference in variability. Using data from a large online CRT study, we replicate the finding that women are more variable in RT than men. However, we also demonstrate an interaction between gender and trial number for RT: women were initially slower than men, but became faster than men across a block. When the first two trials of the block are excluded, the gender effects on RT variability disappear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16887784     DOI: 10.1080/138255890969375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn        ISSN: 1382-5585


  8 in total

1.  Age differences in reaction time and attention in a national telephone sample of adults: education, sex, and task complexity matter.

Authors:  Patricia A Tun; Margie E Lachman
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2008-09

2.  Women are more sensitive than men to prior trial events on the Stop-signal task.

Authors:  Katharine N Thakkar; Eliza Congdon; Russell A Poldrack; Fred W Sabb; Edythe D London; Tyrone D Cannon; Robert M Bilder
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2013-05-15

3.  Prestimulus vigilance predicts response speed in an easy visual discrimination task.

Authors:  Juliane Minkwitz; Maja U Trenner; Christian Sander; Sebastian Olbrich; Abigail J Sheldrick; Peter Schönknecht; Ulrich Hegerl; Hubertus Himmerich
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 3.759

4.  Factors influencing the latency of simple reaction time.

Authors:  David L Woods; John M Wyma; E William Yund; Timothy J Herron; Bruce Reed
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Age-related slowing of response selection and production in a visual choice reaction time task.

Authors:  David L Woods; John M Wyma; E William Yund; Timothy J Herron; Bruce Reed
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Development of a test for recording both visual and auditory reaction times, potentially useful for future studies in patients on opioids therapy.

Authors:  Luca Miceli; Rym Bednarova; Alessandro Rizzardo; Valentina Samogin; Giorgio Della Rocca
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 4.162

7.  Subcortical Ischemic Vascular Cognitive Impairment: Insights from Reaction Time Measures.

Authors:  Emma Richards; Antony Bayer; Jeremy J Tree; Claire Hanley; Jade E Norris; Andrea Tales
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.472

8.  Gender moderates the association between chronic academic stress with top-down and bottom-up attention.

Authors:  Bradley J Wright; Kira-Elise Wilson; Michael Kingsley; Paul Maruff; Jian Li; Johannes Siegrist; Ben Horan
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.199

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.