Literature DB >> 1688778

Selectively eliminating cochlear microphonic contamination from the frequency-following response.

T C Chimento1, C E Schreiner.   

Abstract

The frequency-following response (FFR) is the scalp recorded response to low frequency stimuli. As an electrophysiological method for determining auditory threshold, it has application in both clinical and research settings. However, the response is often contaminated with the cochlear microphonic (CM), reflecting the response of outer hair cells, rather than neural generators (i.e., auditory nerve, cochlear nucleus, superior olivary nucleus, inferior colliculus, etc.). The FFR needs to be a purely neural response to establish its clinical and experimental usefulness. The methods applied to date have failed to accomplish this. The present study demonstrates a method of deriving a pure neural response by subtracting a forward masked FFR, which contains only CM, from an unmasked FFR. To confirm that the residual response after forward masking is solely CM, one needs to record two forward masked responses with opposite phase probe stimuli. When the responses are added they will sum to zero only if the residual response with forward masking is pure CM. This study demonstrates that the traditional method for removing CM from FFR, by simple summation of unmasked responses recorded with stimuli of opposite phase, does not accurately reflect the amplitude or frequency of the FFR, while the proposed method provides an accurate assessment of the FFR amplitude free of CM contamination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1688778     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(90)90156-e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  14 in total

1.  Seasonal variation in avian auditory evoked responses to tones: a comparative analysis of Carolina chickadees, tufted titmice, and white-breasted nuthatches.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Lucas; Todd M Freeberg; Glenis R Long; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Effects of Aging on the Encoding of Dynamic and Static Components of Speech.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Kimberly Jenkins; Rachel Lieberman; Samira Anderson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Processing Complex Sounds Passing through the Rostral Brainstem: The New Early Filter Model.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Tom A Campbell
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Electrophysiological measurement of binaural beats: effects of primary tone frequency and observer age.

Authors:  John H Grose; Sara K Mamo
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Sensorineural hearing loss amplifies neural coding of envelope information in the central auditory system of chinchillas.

Authors:  Ziwei Zhong; Kenneth S Henry; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Round window electrocochleography just before cochlear implantation: relationship to word recognition outcomes in adults.

Authors:  Douglas C Fitzpatrick; Adam P Campbell; Adam T Campbell; Baishakhi Choudhury; Margaret T Dillon; Margaret P Dillon; Mathieu Forgues; Craig A Buchman; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Brainstem correlates of concurrent speech identification in adverse listening conditions.

Authors:  Anusha Yellamsetty; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Temporal Envelope Coding of the Human Auditory Nerve Inferred from Electrocochleography: Comparison with Envelope Following Responses.

Authors:  Jessica Chen; Skyler G Jennings
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-08-10

Review 9.  Enhanced brainstem phase-locking in low-level noise reveals stochastic resonance in the frequency-following response (FFR).

Authors:  Bhanu Shukla; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Intraoperative round window recordings to acoustic stimuli from cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Baishakhi Choudhury; Douglas C Fitzpatrick; Craig A Buchman; Benjamin P Wei; Margaret T Dillon; Shuman He; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.