Literature DB >> 16885929

Relationship between the surrogate anthropometric measures, foot length and chest circumference and birth weight among newborns of Sarlahi, Nepal.

L C Mullany1, G L Darmstadt, S K Khatry, S C Leclerq, J M Tielsch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Classification of infants into low birth weight (LBW, <2500 g) or very low birth weight (VLBW, <2000 g) categories is a crucial step in targeting interventions to high-risk infants.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the validity of chest circumference and foot length as surrogate anthropometric measures for the identification of LBW and VLBW infants. SUBJECTS AND
SETTING: Newborn infants (n=1640) born between March and June 2004 in 30 Village Development Committees of Sarlahi district, Nepal.
DESIGN: Chest circumference, foot length and weight (SECA 727, precise to 2 g) of newborns were measured within 72 h after birth. The sensitivity, specificity and predictive values for a range of cutoff points of the anthropometric measures were estimated using the digital scale measurements as the gold standard.
RESULTS: Among LBW infants (469/1640, 28.6%), chest circumference measures <30.3 cm were 91% sensitive and 83% specific. Similar levels of sensitivity for foot length were achieved only with considerable loss of specificity (<45%). Foot length measurements <6.9 cm were 88% sensitive and 86% specific for the identification of VLBW infants.
CONCLUSION: Chest circumference was superior to foot length in classification of infants into birth weight categories. For the identification of VLBW infants, foot length performed well, and may be preferable to chest circumference, as the former measure does not require removal of infant swaddling clothes. In the absence of more precise direct measures of birth weight, chest circumference is recommended over foot length for the identification of LBW infants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16885929      PMCID: PMC2329807          DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0954-3007            Impact factor:   4.016


  37 in total

1.  Footlength measurement in the neonate.

Authors:  J R Gohil; M Sosi; S N Vani; A B Desai
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 2.  Detection of low birth-weight new born babies by anthropometric measurements in Bangladesh.

Authors:  F Huque; A M Hussain
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  Foot length measurement from foot print for identifying a newborn at risk.

Authors:  S R Daga; A S Daga; S Patole; S Kadam; Y Mukadam
Journal:  J Trop Pediatr       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 1.165

4.  Neonatal mid-upper-arm circumference is a valid proxy for birth-weight.

Authors:  R Sauerborn; R M Ouiminga; B Koné; R Sama; C Oepen; G J Ebrahim
Journal:  Trop Med Parasitol       Date:  1990-03

5.  Simple tricoloured measuring tapes for identification of low birthweight babies by community health workers.

Authors:  M Singh; V K Paul; A D Deorari; P N Anandalakshmi; K R Sundaram
Journal:  Ann Trop Paediatr       Date:  1988-06

6.  Thigh circumference at birth as the best predictor of low birth weight babies.

Authors:  J N Sharma; S Saxena; U Sharma
Journal:  Indian Pediatr       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.411

7.  A simple device for measurement of foot length in neonates.

Authors:  C R Ramachandran
Journal:  J Trop Pediatr       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 1.165

8.  Use of a simple anthropometric measurement to predict birth weight. WHO Collaborative Study of Birth Weight Surrogates.

Authors: 
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.408

9.  'Foot length'--a newer approach in neonatal anthropometry.

Authors:  A Mathur; S K Tak; P Kothari
Journal:  J Trop Pediatr       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 1.165

10.  Mid-arm and chest circumferences at birth as predictors of low birth weight and neonatal mortality in the community.

Authors:  S K Bhargava; S Ramji; A Kumar; M Mohan; J Marwah; H P Sachdev
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-12-07
View more
  20 in total

1.  Meta-analysis to estimate the correlation coefficients between birthweight and other anthropometric measurements at birth.

Authors:  Eita Goto
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2010-11-14       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Multiparametric body composition analysis and anthropometric empirical indicator: obesity based south Indian perspective.

Authors:  K B Kishore Mohan; M Anburajan
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Justification of anthropometric empirical indicator (AEI) by digital chest and pelvic X-rays: a comparative scenario with DXA on obesity grounds.

Authors:  K B Kishore Mohan; M Anburajan
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Validity of Newborn Clinical Assessment to Determine Gestational Age in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Anne Cc Lee; Luke C Mullany; Karima Ladhani; Jamal Uddin; Dipak Mitra; Parvez Ahmed; Parul Christian; Alain Labrique; Sushil K DasGupta; R Peter Lokken; Mohammed Quaiyum; Abdullah H Baqui
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Measuring newborn foot length to identify small babies in need of extra care: a cross sectional hospital based study with community follow-up in Tanzania.

Authors:  Tanya Marchant; Jennie Jaribu; Suzanne Penfold; Marcel Tanner; Joanna Armstrong Schellenberg
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Validation of the foot length measure as an alternative tool to identify low birth weight and preterm babies in a low-resource setting like Nepal: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ashish Kc; Viktoria Nelin; Ravi Vitrakoti; Surabhi Aryal; Mats Målqvist
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 2.125

Review 7.  Meta-analysis: identification of low birthweight by other anthropometric measurements at birth in developing countries.

Authors:  Eita Goto
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 3.211

8.  Determining an anthropometric surrogate measure for identifying low birth weight babies in Uganda: a hospital-based cross sectional study.

Authors:  Nabiwemba L Elizabeth; Orach Garimoi Christopher; Kolsteren Patrick
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 2.125

9.  Anthropometric surrogates to identify low birth weight Nepalese newborns: a hospital-based study.

Authors:  Chandrashekhar T Sreeramareddy; Neena Chuni; Rajkumar Patil; Dela Singh; Brishna Shakya
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 2.125

10.  Measuring new born foot length to identify small babies in need of extra care: a cross-sectional hospital based study.

Authors:  Satarupa Mukherjee; Prithwish Roy; Souvik Mitra; Moumita Samanta; Sukanta Chatterjee
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.