Literature DB >> 16885092

Routine screening: informed consent, stigma and the waning of HIV exceptionalism.

Matthew K Wynia1.   

Abstract

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently recommended that HIV screening should become routine for all adults in the United States. Implicit in the CDC proposal is the notion that pre-test counseling would be more limited than at present, and that written informed consent to screening would no longer be required. If widely implemented, routine testing would mark a tremendous shift in the US HIV screening strategy. There are a number of considerations used to determine what screening tests should be routine, and HIV fits the bill in almost every regard. Yet the stigma associated with HIV infection remains, making the CDC's recommendation highly controversial. Will minimizing requirements for pre-test counseling and special written informed consent lead to unexpected or unwanted HIV testing, or do these stringent counseling and consent requirements needlessly scare people away? Will widespread and routine testing be associated with declining stigmatization, or will it drive some patients away from seeking desperately needed health care? These are high stakes questions, and we're about to find out the answers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16885092     DOI: 10.1080/15265160600843536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bioeth        ISSN: 1526-5161            Impact factor:   11.229


  7 in total

1.  Pharmacy Intervention to Improve HIV Testing Uptake Using a Comprehensive Health Screening Approach.

Authors:  Natalie D Crawford; Trevano Dean; Alexis V Rivera; Taylor Guffey; Silvia Amesty; Abby Rudolph; Jennifer DeCuir; Crystal M Fuller
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Preliminary program evaluation of emergency department HIV prevention counseling.

Authors:  Andrea P Sitlinger; Christopher J Lindsell; Andrew H Ruffner; D Beth Wayne; Kimberly W Hart; Alexander T Trott; Carl J Fichtenbaum; Michael S Lyons
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Interpreting and implementing the 2006 CDC recommendations for HIV testing in health-care settings.

Authors:  Michael S Lyons; Christopher J Lindsell; Carl J Fichtenbaum; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  A qualitative assessment of emergency department patients' knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and acceptance toward revised HIV testing strategies.

Authors:  Ethan Cowan; Jason Leider; Lorena Velastegui; Juliana Wexler; Jennifer Velloza; Yvette Calderon
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.451

5.  Perspectives on the ethical concerns and justifications of the 2006 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention HIV testing recommendations.

Authors:  Michael J Waxman; Roland C Merchant; M Teresa Celada; Melissa A Clark
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 6.  HIV testing and care in Burkina Faso, Kenya, Malawi and Uganda: ethics on the ground.

Authors:  Carla Makhlouf Obermeyer; Sarah Bott; Ron Bayer; Alice Desclaux; Rachel Baggaley
Journal:  BMC Int Health Hum Rights       Date:  2013-01-23

7.  Perspectives on the ethical concerns and justifications of the 2006 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention HIV testing: HIV screening policy changes.

Authors:  Michael J Waxman; Roland C Merchant; M Teresa Celada; Melissa A Clark
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 2.652

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.