Literature DB >> 16884950

Comparison of multiple shell vial cell lines for isolation of enteroviruses: a national perspective.

Rosemary C She1, Gwen Crist, Erick Billetdeaux, Janine Langer, Cathy A Petti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Isolation of enterovirus in cell culture is still utilized by clinical laboratories, for vaccine research, and for identifying serotypes for disease surveillance. Use of a combination of cell lines is recommended yet this practice has not been rigorously examined for shell vials.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the growth predilection of enterovirus serotypes for certain shell vial cell lines in clinical samples received at a national reference laboratory. STUDY
DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed results of samples submitted for viral culture over a 3-year period. PMK, BGM, RD, A549, and MRC-5 cell lines grown in shell vials were inoculated and serotyped.
RESULTS: Of 55,816 cultures, 1047 (1.9%) yielded enterovirus representing 18 serotypes. Echovirus 7, echovirus 9, and echovirus 30 were the most common serotypes recovered in 2002, 2003, and 2004, respectively. PMK and MRC-5 recovered the majority of enterovirus isolates; the addition of BGM and RD cells increased our recovery rate by 13%. For 52.6% of enteroviral isolates, cytopathic effect was found in only a single cell line. PMK and BGM cells were effective in isolating coxsackieviruses, and RD and MRC-5 were useful particularly in isolating echoviruses.
CONCLUSIONS: A combination of shell vial cell lines is still recommended for recovery of enteroviruses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16884950     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2006.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Virol        ISSN: 1386-6532            Impact factor:   3.168


  6 in total

1.  Viral kinetics of enterovirus 71 in human abdomyosarcoma cells.

Authors:  Jing Lu; Ya-Qing He; Li-Na Yi; Hong Zan; Hsiang-Fu Kung; Ming-Liang He
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Role of cell culture for virus detection in the age of technology.

Authors:  Diane S Leland; Christine C Ginocchio
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 3.  Virological and Immunological Outcomes of Coinfections.

Authors:  Naveen Kumar; Shalini Sharma; Sanjay Barua; Bhupendra N Tripathi; Barry T Rouse
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Non-rhinovirus enteroviruses associated with respiratory infections in Peru (2005-2010).

Authors:  Jose L Huaman; Gladys Carrion; Julia S Ampuero; Jorge Gomez; Victor Ocaña; Irmia Paz; Elizabeth Gomez; Edward Chavez; Favio Sarmiento; Edward Pozo; V Alberto Laguna-Torres; Eric S Halsey
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 4.099

5.  Rapid detection of respiratory picornaviruses in nasopharyngeal aspirates by immunofluorescence assay.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Barbani; Meri Gorgievski-Hrisoho
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 3.168

6.  Flow cytometric detection and serotyping of enterovirus for the clinical laboratory.

Authors:  Rosemary C She; Sergey N Preobrazhensky; Edward W Taggart; Cathy A Petti; David W Bahler
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 2.014

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.