Literature DB >> 16884843

Trends in obstetric interventions in the Dutch obstetrical care system in the period 1993-2002.

A Kwee1, P M Elferink-Stinkens, P J H M Reuwer, H W Bruinse.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine trends in induction of labour-, instrumental vaginal delivery- and caesarean section rates in the Netherlands in the period 1993-2002. STUDY
DESIGN: Data derived from The Netherlands Perinatal Registry and Statistics Netherlands were used to calculate annual rates for induction of labour, instrumental vaginal delivery and caesarean section. Regarding caesarean section, rates were also calculated for different subgroups with respect to parity, presentation of the fetus, gestational age and multiple pregnancies. In the subgroup of women with a singleton fetus in vertex presentation between 37 and 42 weeks of gestation instrumental delivery rates were compared for women with induced labours and women in spontaneous labour.
RESULTS: The overall CS rate rose from 8.1 to 13.6%. Proportionally the rise was greatest for breech presentation (+37.7%), multiple gestations (+12.7%) and women delivering between 24 and 28 weeks (+9.5%). However, in absolute numbers the rise was most impressive in the group of women with a singleton fetus in vertex presentation between 37 and 42 weeks of gestation. Rate of induction of labour and instrumental vaginal delivery remained constant (approximately 15% respectively 10% of all deliveries). In nulliparous term women with singletons in vertex presentation the CS rate increased with 8.0% to a rate of 20.7% when labour was induced versus an increase of 3.4% to a rate of 7.5% in spontaneous labour.
CONCLUSION: In absolute numbers the rise in CS was most extensive in the group of women with a singleton fetus in vertex presentation between 37 and 42 weeks of gestation. Induction of labour rates and instrumental vaginal delivery rates remained constant during the past decade.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16884843     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  11 in total

1.  Operative delivery rates following induction of labour for obstetric cholestasis.

Authors:  Jessica R Webster; Lucy Chappell; Floria Cheng; Andrew C G Breeze; Nuala Lucas; Felicity Plaat; Catherine Williamson
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2011-05-24

2.  Effect of childbirth on the course of Crohn's disease; results from a retrospective cohort study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Marieke Smink; Frederik K Lotgering; Lisette Albers; Dirk J de Jong
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Increased maternal TSH and decreased maternal FT4 are associated with a higher operative delivery rate in low-risk pregnancies: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  L Monen; V J Pop; T H Hasaart; H Wijnen; S G Oei; S M Kuppens
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Development and Measurement of Guidelines-Based Quality Indicators of Caesarean Section Care in the Netherlands: A RAND-Modified Delphi Procedure and Retrospective Medical Chart Review.

Authors:  Sonja Melman; Ellen C N Schoorel; Karin de Boer; Henriëtte Burggraaf; Jan B Derks; Det van Dijk; Jeroen van Dillen; Carmen D Dirksen; Johannes J Duvekot; Arie Franx; Tom H M Hasaart; Anjoke J M Huisjes; Diny Kolkman; Sander van Kuijk; Anneke Kwee; Ben W Mol; Mariëlle G van Pampus; Alieke de Roon-Immerzeel; Jos J M van Roosmalen; Frans J M E Roumen; Ellen Smid-Koopman; Luc Smits; Wilbert A Spaans; Harry Visser; Wim J van Wijngaarden; Christine Willekes; Maurice G A J Wouters; Jan G Nijhuis; Rosella P M G Hermens; Hubertina C J Scheepers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Differences in rates and odds for emergency caesarean section in six Palestinian hospitals: a population-based birth cohort study.

Authors:  Mohammed Zimmo; Katariina Laine; Sahar Hassan; Erik Fosse; Marit Lieng; Hadil Ali-Masri; Kaled Zimmo; Marit Anti; Bettina Bottcher; Ragnhild Sørum Falk; Åse Vikanes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Identification of barriers and facilitators for optimal cesarean section care: perspective of professionals.

Authors:  Sonja Melman; Rachel Hellen Petra Schreurs; Carmen Desiree Dirksen; Anneke Kwee; Jan Gerrit Nijhuis; Nicol Anna Cornelia Smeets; Hubertina Catharina Johanna Scheepers; Rosella Petronella Maria Gemma Hermens
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Are freestanding midwifery units a safe alternative to obstetric units for low-risk, primiparous childbirth? An analysis of effect differences by parity in a matched cohort study.

Authors:  Louise Fischer Christensen; Charlotte Overgaard
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Possible relationship between general and pregnancy-related anxiety during the first half of pregnancy and the birth process: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Johanna Maria Koelewijn; Anne Marie Sluijs; Tanja G M Vrijkotte
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  SIMPLE: implementation of recommendations from international evidence-based guidelines on caesarean sections in the Netherlands. Protocol for a controlled before and after study.

Authors:  Sonja Melman; Ellen N C Schoorel; Carmen Dirksen; Anneke Kwee; Luc Smits; Froukje de Boer; Madelaine Jonkers; Mallory D Woiski; Ben Willem J Mol; Johannes P R Doornbos; Harry Visser; Anjoke J M Huisjes; Martina M Porath; Friso M C Delemarre; Simone M I Kuppens; Robert Aardenburg; Ivo M A Van Dooren; Francis P J M Vrouenraets; Frans T H Lim; Gunilla Kleiverda; Paulien C M van der Salm; Karin de Boer; Marko J Sikkema; Jan G Nijhuis; Rosella P M G Hermens; Hubertina C J Scheepers
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Modest Rise in Caesarean Section from 2000-2010: The Dutch Experience.

Authors:  Yanjun Zhao; Jun Zhang; Chantal Hukkelhoven; Pien Offerhaus; Joost Zwart; Ank de Jonge; Caroline Geerts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.