Literature DB >> 16884799

A comparison of prostate IMRT and helical tomotherapy class solutions.

George Rodrigues1, Slav Yartsev, Jeff Chen, Eugene Wong, David D'Souza, Michael Lock, Glenn Bauman, Grigor Grigorov, Tomas Kron.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess a variety of potential IMRT class solutions as compared to a helical tomotherapy (HT) class solution for localized prostate cancer. Target and critical structures were contoured on 10 prostate cancer patient CT datasets. HT treatment plans were compared to four different IMRT approaches by paired t-tests. HT prostate planning generally provided treatment plans with excellent target homogeneity and favorable critical structure sparing when compared to conventional IMRT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16884799     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  8 in total

1.  A planning comparison of dynamic IMRT for different collimator leaf thicknesses with helical tomotherapy and RapidArc for prostate and head and neck tumors.

Authors:  Vesna Jacob; Wolfgang Bayer; Sabrina T Astner; R Busch; Peter Kneschaurek
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning in seven mouse clicks: Development of a class solution for cancer.

Authors:  Maree Wood; Amara Fonseca; David Sampson; Andrew Kovendy; Justin Westhuyzen; Thomas Shakespeare; Kirsty Turnbull
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-09-30

3.  Class solution in inverse planned HDR prostate brachytherapy for dose escalation of DIL defined by combined MRI/MRSI.

Authors:  Yongbok Kim; I-Chow J Hsu; Etienne Lessard; John Kurhanewicz; Susan Moyher Noworolski; Jean Pouliot
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Dosimetric selection for helical tomotherapy based stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer or lung metastases.

Authors:  Alexander Chi; Zhongxing Liao; Nam P Nguyen; Jiahong Xu; James S Welsh; Si Young Jang; Carol Howe; Ritsuko Komaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Dose-volume histogram comparison between static 5-field IMRT with 18-MV X-rays and helical tomotherapy with 6-MV X-rays.

Authors:  Akihiro Hayashi; Yuta Shibamoto; Yukiko Hattori; Takeshi Tamura; Michio Iwabuchi; Shinya Otsuka; Chikao Sugie; Takeshi Yanagi
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 2.724

6.  Junctioning longitudinally adjacent PTVs with Helical TomoTherapy.

Authors:  Lourdes M Garcia; Lee H Gerig; Peter Raaphorst; David Wilkins
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Optimization of tomotherapy treatment planning for patients with bilateral hip prostheses.

Authors:  David Chapman; Shaun Smith; Rob Barnett; Glenn Bauman; Slav Yartsev
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Comparing planning time, delivery time and plan quality for IMRT, RapidArc and Tomotherapy.

Authors:  Mike Oliver; Will Ansbacher; Wayne A Beckham
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.