Literature DB >> 16884764

Removal of arsenic from groundwater by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF).

Javed Iqbal1, Ho-Jeong Kim, Jung-Seok Yang, Kitae Baek, Ji-Won Yang.   

Abstract

The removal characteristics of arsenate using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF) were investigated. Among four different cationic surfactants used, hexadecylpyridinium chloride (CPC) showed the highest removal efficiency of arsenic (96%), and the removal efficiency with hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) was 94%. But the removal efficiency with benzalkonium chloride (BC) was the lowest (57%) due to higher critical micelle concentration (CMC) of BC than those of other surfactants. Over 80% of arsenic was removed with octadecylamine acetate (ODA). On the effect of solution pH on the arsenic removal, since the valance of arsenate decreases from trivalent to monovalent as pH decreases, the removal was reduced at lower pH. The presence of 0.45mM of nitrate and 0.01mM of phosphate reduced the removal efficiency by 5-8%. This decrease was because of the competition between the arsenate, nitrate and phosphate for the binding sites of the surfactant micelle. Similar decrease in the removal of arsenate was observed with CPC, CTAB and ODA in the presence of these anions. In cross-flow filtration, the removal efficiency of arsenic was similar to that in the dead-end system. However, the decline in flux was less than that in dead-end filtration. In order to lower the concentration of the surfactant in the effluent, the effluent was treated with powdered activated carbon (PAC) before discharging to the environment. Over 98% surfactant was removed with 1gl(-1) of PAC. In conclusions, the MEUF is considered as a feasible process using CPC or CTAB to remove the arsenate from groundwater compared with the other solid based adsorbent processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16884764     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  10 in total

1.  Preparation of Fe oxide nanoparticles for environmental applications: arsenic removal.

Authors:  Ulker Beker; Luis Cumbal; Dilek Duranoglu; Ilknur Kucuk; Arup K Sengupta
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Rapid and high-capacity adsorption of PFOS and PFOA by regenerable ammoniated magnetic particle.

Authors:  Tongzhou Liu; Yurong Gu; Ding Yu Xing; Wenyi Dong; Xiuwei Wu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  A review of global outlook on fluoride contamination in groundwater with prominence on the Pakistan current situation.

Authors:  Atta Rasool; Abida Farooqi; Tangfu Xiao; Waqar Ali; Sifat Noor; Oyebamiji Abiola; Salar Ali; Wajid Nasim
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 4.609

4.  Colloid-enhanced ultrafiltration in removal of traces amounts of borates from water.

Authors:  M Bryjak; I Duraj; G Poźniak
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 4.609

5.  Remediation of arsenic-contaminated groundwater using media-injected permeable reactive barriers with a modified montmorillonite: sand tank studies.

Authors:  Ximing Luo; Haifei Liu; Guoxin Huang; Ye Li; Yan Zhao; Xu Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Preparation of the pyridinium salts differing in the length of the N-alkyl substituent.

Authors:  Jan Marek; Petr Stodulka; Jiri Cabal; Ondrej Soukup; Miroslav Pohanka; Jan Korabecny; Kamil Musilek; Kamil Kuca
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  Green Synthesis and Characterization of Antimicrobial Synergistic AgCl/BAC Nanocolloids.

Authors:  Syed Imdadul Hossain; Maria Chiara Sportelli; Rosaria Anna Picca; Luigi Gentile; Gerardo Palazzo; Nicoletta Ditaranto; Nicola Cioffi
Journal:  ACS Appl Bio Mater       Date:  2022-06-23

8.  Mixed Micellar Solubilization of Naphthol Green B Followed by Its Removal from Synthetic Effluent by Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration under Optimized Conditions.

Authors:  Amnah Yusaf; Muhammad Usman; Muhammad Siddiq; Manahil Bakhtiar; Asim Mansha; Saadia Shaukat; Hafiza Fatima Rehman
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.927

9.  Effect of some operational parameters on the arsenic removal by electrocoagulation using iron electrodes.

Authors:  Berrin Zeliha Can; Recep Boncukcuoglu; Alper Erdem Yilmaz; Baybars Ali Fil
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2014-06-11

Review 10.  Technologies for Arsenic Removal from Water: Current Status and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Nina Ricci Nicomel; Karen Leus; Karel Folens; Pascal Van Der Voort; Gijs Du Laing
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.