Literature DB >> 16883623

Declining medical decision-making capacity in mild AD: a two-year longitudinal study.

Justin S Huthwaite1, Roy C Martin, H Randall Griffith, Britt Anderson, Lindy E Harrell, Daniel C Marson.   

Abstract

This is a report of a two-year longitudinal study comparing healthy older adult subjects (n = 15) and mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients (n = 20) using an objective performance measure of medical decision-making capacity (MDC). Capacity to consent to medical treatment was measured using the Capacity to Consent to Treatment Instrument (CCTI). The CCTI is a psychometric measure that tests MDC using a series of four core capacity standards: S1 (evidencing/communicating choice), S3 (appreciating consequences), S4 (providing rational reasons), and S5 (understanding treatment situation), and one experimental standard [S2] (making the reasonable treatment choice). For each standard, mild AD patients were assigned one of three capacity outcomes (capable, marginally capable, or incapable) based on cut-off scores derived from control group performance. At baseline, mild AD patients performed equivalently with controls on simple standards of evidencing a choice (S1) and making the reasonable choice ([S2]), but significantly below controls on complex standards of appreciation, reasoning, and understanding (S3, S4, and S5) (p < 0.02). Control performance was stable over time on all capacity standards. At one-year follow-up, the mild AD group did not show significant decline from baseline on any capacity standard. However, at two-year follow-up the mild AD group showed significant declines from baseline on the three complex standards (S3, S4, and S5) (p < 0.02), and a trend on one of the simple standards (S1). Over the two-year period, the proportion of marginally capable and incapable outcomes in the AD group increased substantially for four of the five standards (S1, S3, S4, and S5). Performance on [S2] remained stable over time in the AD group.We conclude that mild AD patients have impaired MDC at baseline, and demonstrate significant additional decline on complex consent abilities of appreciation, reasoning, and understanding over a two-year period. AD patients also show emerging impairment on the simple consent ability of evidencing choice at two-year follow-up. Capacity outcome data reflect similar declines over time for these four consent standards. The findings suggest the value of early assessment and regular monitoring at two-year intervals of MDC in patients with mild AD. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16883623     DOI: 10.1002/bsl.701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Sci Law        ISSN: 0735-3936


  11 in total

1.  Brain metabolic correlates of decision making in amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  H Randall Griffith; Ozioma C Okonkwo; Jan A den Hollander; Katherine Belue; Jacqueline Copeland; Lindy E Harrell; John C Brockington; David G Clark; Daniel C Marson
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2010-04-06

Review 2.  Ethical, Legal and Forensic Issues in Geriatric Psychiatry.

Authors:  Rajesh R Tampi; Juan Young; Silpa Balachandran; Dhweeja Dasarathy; Deena Tampi
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 3.  Consent in impaired populations.

Authors:  Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.081

4.  Enhancing Medical Decision-Making Evaluations: Introduction of Normative Data for the Capacity to Consent to Treatment Instrument.

Authors:  Adam Gerstenecker; Lindsay Niccolai; Daniel Marson; Kristen L Triebel
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2015-08-17

5.  Medical decision-making capacity in mild cognitive impairment: a 3-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  O C Okonkwo; H R Griffith; J N Copeland; K Belue; S Lanza; E Y Zamrini; L E Harrell; J C Brockington; D Clark; R Raman; D C Marson
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 6.  Dementia, Decision Making, and Capacity.

Authors:  R Ryan Darby; Bradford C Dickerson
Journal:  Harv Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  The capacity to consent to treatment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Rossella Spataro; Vincenzo La Bella
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Capacity to vote in persons with dementia and the elderly.

Authors:  Luis Javier Irastorza; Pablo Corujo; Pilar Bañuelos
Journal:  Int J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2011-07-18

Review 9.  Determining medical decision-making capacity in brain tumor patients: why and how?

Authors:  Andrea Pace; Johan A F Koekkoek; Martin J van den Bent; Helen J Bulbeck; Jane Fleming; Robin Grant; Heidrun Golla; Roger Henriksson; Simon Kerrigan; Christine Marosi; Ingela Oberg; Stefan Oberndorfer; Kathy Oliver; H Roeline W Pasman; Emilie Le Rhun; Alasdair G Rooney; Roberta Rudà; Simone Veronese; Tobias Walbert; Michael Weller; Wolfgang Wick; Martin J B Taphoorn; Linda Dirven
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2020-07-16

Review 10.  What are the boundaries of legal guardianship in Alzheimer's disease? An evidence-based update in the context of the Brazilian Civil Code.

Authors:  Felipe K Sudo; Ana C Salles; Clarisse R de Santiago
Journal:  Braz J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.697

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.