Literature DB >> 16883077

Effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of homeopathy in general practice - summarized health technology assessment.

Gudrun Bornhöft1, Ursula Wolf, Klaus von Ammon, Marco Righetti, Stefanie Maxion-Bergemann, Stephan Baumgartner, Andr Eacute Thurneysen, Peter F Matthiessen.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Health Technology Assessment report on effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and appropriateness of homeopathy was compiled on behalf of the Swiss Federal Office for Public Health (BAG) within the framework of the 'Program of Evaluation of Complementary Medicine (PEK)'.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Databases accessible by Internet were systematically searched, complemented by manual search and contacts with experts, and evaluated according to internal and external validity criteria.
RESULTS: Many high-quality investigations of pre-clinical basic research proved homeopathic high-potencies inducing regulative and specific changes in cells or living organisms. 20 of 22 systematic reviews detected at least a trend in favor of homeopathy. In our estimation 5 studies yielded results indicating clear evidence for homeopathic therapy. The evaluation of 29 studies in the domain 'Upper Respiratory Tract Infections/Allergic Reactions' showed a positive overall result in favor of homeopathy. 6 out of 7 controlled studies were at least equivalent to conventional medical interventions. 8 out of 16 placebo-controlled studies were significant in favor of homeopathy. Swiss regulations grant a high degree of safety due to product and training requirements for homeopathic physicians. Applied properly, classical homeopathy has few side-effects and the use of high-potencies is free of toxic effects. A general health-economic statement about homeopathy cannot be made from the available data.
CONCLUSION: Taking internal and external validity criteria into account, effectiveness of homeopathy can be supported by clinical evidence and professional and adequate application be regarded as safe. Reliable statements of cost-effectiveness are not available at the moment. External and model validity will have to be taken more strongly into consideration in future studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16883077     DOI: 10.1159/000093586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forsch Komplementmed        ISSN: 1661-4119


  16 in total

1.  The Evolution of Homeopathic Theory-Driven Research and the Methodological Toolbox.

Authors:  Iris R Bell
Journal:  Am Homeopath       Date:  2008

Review 2.  Homeopathic Oscillococcinum® for preventing and treating influenza and influenza-like illness.

Authors:  Robert T Mathie; Joyce Frye; Peter Fisher
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-01-28

Review 3.  Economic evaluations of homeopathy: a review.

Authors:  Petter Viksveen; Zofia Dymitr; Steven Simoens
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-02-10

4.  Method for appraising model validity of randomised controlled trials of homeopathic treatment: multi-rater concordance study.

Authors:  Robert T Mathie; Helmut Roniger; Michel Van Wassenhoven; Joyce Frye; Jennifer Jacobs; Menachem Oberbaum; Marie-France Bordet; Chaturbhuja Nayak; Gilles Chaufferin; John A Ives; Flávio Dantas; Peter Fisher
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Checklist for the qualitative evaluation of clinical studies with particular focus on external validity and model validity.

Authors:  Gudrun Bornhöft; Stefanie Maxion-Bergemann; Ursula Wolf; Gunver S Kienle; Andreas Michalsen; Horst C Vollmar; Simon Gilbertson; Peter F Matthiessen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 6.  Exploring Possible Mechanisms of Hormesis and Homeopathy in the Light of Nanopharmacology and Ultra-High Dilutions.

Authors:  Dana Ullman
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Are complementary therapies and integrative care cost-effective? A systematic review of economic evaluations.

Authors:  Patricia M Herman; Beth L Poindexter; Claudia M Witt; David M Eisenberg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Differences in Median Ultraviolet Light Transmissions of Serial Homeopathic Dilutions of Copper Sulfate, Hypericum perforatum, and Sulfur.

Authors:  Sabine D Klein; Annegret Sandig; Stephan Baumgartner; Ursula Wolf
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 2.629

9.  The Red flag! risk assessment among medical homeopaths in Norway: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Trine Stub; Terje Alraek; Anita Salamonsen
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 3.659

10.  Homeopathic Preparations of Quartz, Sulfur and Copper Sulfate Assessed by UV-Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Ursula Wolf; Martin Wolf; Peter Heusser; André Thurneysen; Stephan Baumgartner
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 2.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.