Literature DB >> 16882940

Randomized phase III trial of topotecan following carboplatin and paclitaxel in first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a gynecologic cancer intergroup trial of the AGO-OVAR and GINECO.

Jacobus Pfisterer1, Béatrice Weber, Alexander Reuss, Rainer Kimmig, Andreas du Bois, Uwe Wagner, Hugues Bourgeois, Werner Meier, Serban Costa, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, Alain Lortholary, Sigrid Olbricht, Anne Stähle, Christian Jackisch, Anne-Claire Hardy-Bessard, Volker Möbus, Jens Quaas, Barbara Richter, Willibald Schröder, Jean-François Geay, Hans-Joachim Lück, Walther Kuhn, Harald Meden, Ulrike Nitz, Eric Pujade-Lauraine.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel is the standard of care for the treatment of ovarian cancer, yet rates of recurrence and death remain high. We performed a prospective randomized phase III study to examine whether sequential administration of topotecan can improve the efficacy of carboplatin and paclitaxel in first-line treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.
METHODS: A total of 1308 patients with previously untreated ovarian cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IIB-IV) were randomly assigned to receive six cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by either four cycles of topotecan (TC-Top; 658 patients) or surveillance (TC; 650 patients) on a 3-week per cycle schedule. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, response rate, toxicity, and quality of life. Time-to-event data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and a stratified log-rank test was used to compare distributions between treatment groups. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model. Categorical data were compared using a stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: Median progression-free survival was 18.2 months in the TC-Top arm versus 18.5 months in the TC arm (stratum-adjusted HR = 0.97 [95% CI = 0.85 to 1.10]; P = .688). Median overall survival was 43.1 months for the TC-Top arm versus 44.5 months for the TC arm (stratum-adjusted HR = 1.01 [95% CI = 0.86 to 1.18]; P = .885). At 3 years, overall survival in both arms was 57% (58.5% in the TC arm and 55.7% in the TC-Top arm). Compared with patients in the TC arm, patients in the TC-Top arm had more grade 3-4 hematologic toxic effects (requiring more supportive care) and more grade 3-4 infections (5.1% versus 2.7%; P = .034) but did not have a statistically significant increase in febrile neutropenia (3.3% versus 3.1%; P = .80). Among patients who had measurable disease (TC, n = 147; TC-Top, n = 145), overall (i.e., complete or partial) response was 69.0% (95% CI = 61.4% to 76.5%) in the TC-Top arm and 76.2% (95% CI = 69.3% to 83.1%) in the TC arm (P = .166).
CONCLUSIONS: The sequential addition of topotecan to carboplatin-paclitaxel did not result in superior overall response or progression-free or overall survival. Therefore, this regimen is not recommended as standard of care treatment for ovarian cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16882940     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djj296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  47 in total

Review 1.  Maintenance chemotherapy: an evolving and increasingly acceptable strategy in cancer management.

Authors:  Maurie Markman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  Health-related quality of life in ovarian cancer patients and its impact on clinical management.

Authors:  Dana M Chase; Lari Wenzel
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.217

3.  Duration of second or greater complete clinical remission in ovarian cancer: exploring potential endpoints for clinical trials.

Authors:  Michelle L Harrison; Martin E Gore; David Spriggs; Stan Kaye; Alexia Iasonos; Martee Hensley; Carol Aghajanian; Ennapadam Venkatraman; Paul Sabbatini
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Real-world experience of olaparib as maintenance therapy in BRCA-mutated recurrent ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Angela Cho; Jeong-Yeol Park; Shin-Wha Lee; Dae-Yeon Kim; Dae-Shik Suh; Jong-Hyeok Kim; Yong-Man Kim; Young-Tak Kim
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 5.  First-line and maintenance therapy for ovarian cancer: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Antonio González-Martín; Luisa Sánchez-Lorenzo; Raquel Bratos; Raúl Márquez; Luis Chiva
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Pharmacological Inhibition of BAD Ser99 Phosphorylation Enhances the Efficacy of Cisplatin in Ovarian Cancer by Inhibition of Cancer Stem Cell-like Behavior.

Authors:  Yanxin Wang; Yi-Shiou Chiou; Qing-Yun Chong; Mengyi Zhang; Kanchuragoppal S Rangappa; Lan Ma; Tao Zhu; Alan Prem Kumar; Ruby Yun-Ju Huang; Vijay Pandey; Peter E Lobie
Journal:  ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci       Date:  2020-10-09

7.  Current status of maintenance therapy for advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Joanie Mayer Hope; Stephanie V Blank
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

8.  A Systematic Review of Health-Related Quality of Life Reporting in Ovarian Cancer Phase III Clinical Trials: Room to Improve.

Authors:  Michelle K Wilson; Michael L Friedlander; Florence Joly; Amit M Oza
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-11-08

Review 9.  Progress in gynecologic cancer research: the Gynecologic Oncology Group experience.

Authors:  George A Omura
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 10.  Pharmaceutical management of ovarian cancer : current status.

Authors:  Maurie Markman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.