Literature DB >> 16882834

Extremely growth-retarded infants: is there a viability centile?

Vishwanath M Kamoji1, Jon S Dorling, Bradley N Manktelow, Elizabeth S Draper, David J Field.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is known that extremely premature infants do less well than more mature infants, and this fact has led some countries to adopt a "cutoff for viability" using birth weight or gestation. Infants affected by intrauterine growth retardation are at additional risk of poor outcome. There are few data to inform decisions about viability and (dis)continuation of intensive care when both extreme prematurity and severe growth retardation are present.
OBJECTIVE: We focused on (1) premature infants affected by marked intrauterine growth retardation to determine if there was a cutoff weight centile below which the mortality sharply increased and (2) the short-term outcome of extremely premature and growth-retarded infants to determine a cutoff for viability.
METHODS: We evaluated preterm infants of 22-32 weeks' gestation if they were alive at the onset of labor and born to European mothers resident in the Trent (United Kingdom) health region between 1994 and 2003. Infants were categorized into 6 weight centiles, and infants in each category were assessed for survival to discharge from the neonatal unit, duration of respiratory support, length of stay in the neonatal unit, and the age at death in nonsurvivors.
RESULTS: We identified a total of 8228 infants who met the study criteria. Of these, 4448 infants were male, 6194 were from singleton pregnancies, and 2887 were born at < or = 28 completed weeks of gestation. Survival to discharge was markedly reduced in the infants born at < or = 28 weeks of gestation with a birth weight less than the 2nd centile. Stillbirth was inversely related to birth weight centile in infants born before 29 weeks of gestation.
CONCLUSIONS: The survival for infants born at < or = 28 weeks' gestation and having a birth weight in less than the 2nd centile is poor, and consideration should be given to modifying their management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16882834     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-2399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  7 in total

1.  Outcomes of small for gestational age infants born at <27 weeks' gestation.

Authors:  Lilia C De Jesus; Athina Pappas; Seetha Shankaran; Lei Li; Abhik Das; Edward F Bell; Barbara J Stoll; Abbot R Laptook; Michele C Walsh; Ellen C Hale; Nancy S Newman; Rebecca Bara; Rosemary D Higgins
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  Cord blood biomarkers of vascular endothelial growth (VEGF and sFlt-1) and postnatal growth: a preterm birth cohort study.

Authors:  Stephannie Baehl Voller; Susanne Chock; Linda M Ernst; Emily Su; Xin Liu; Kathryn N Farrow; Karen K Mestan
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  The use of angiogenic biomarkers in maternal blood to identify which SGA fetuses will require a preterm delivery and mothers who will develop pre-eclampsia.

Authors:  Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Roberto Romero; Amy E Whitten; Steven J Korzeniewski; Piya Chaemsaithong; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Lami Yeo; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2016

4.  Comparing regional infant death rates: the influence of preterm births <24 weeks of gestation.

Authors:  Lucy Smith; Elizabeth S Draper; Bradley N Manktelow; Catherine Pritchard; David John Field
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 5.747

5.  Second trimester amniocentesis is not a risk factor for very low birth weight and extremely low birth weight.

Authors:  Vincenzo Mazza; Mariangela Pati; Emma Bertucci; Carlotta Cani; Silvia Latella; Giancarlo Gargano; Antonio Percesepe; Annibale Volpe
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-08-03

6.  Low birth weight is a risk factor for severe retinopathy of prematurity depending on gestational age.

Authors:  Pia Lundgren; Anna Kistner; Eva M Andersson; Ingrid Hansen Pupp; Gerd Holmström; David Ley; Aimon Niklasson; Lois E H Smith; Carolyn Wu; Ann Hellström; Chatarina Löfqvist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparing very low birth weight versus very low gestation cohort methods for outcome analysis of high risk preterm infants.

Authors:  Louise Im Koller-Smith; Prakesh S Shah; Xiang Y Ye; Gunnar Sjörs; Yueping A Wang; Sharon S W Chow; Brian A Darlow; Shoo K Lee; Stellan Håkanson; Kei Lui
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.125

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.