Literature DB >> 16882633

The effect of a complex training and detraining programme on selected strength and power variables in early pubertal boys.

Lee Ingle1, Mike Sleap, Keith Tolfrey.   

Abstract

Complex training, a combination of resistance training and plyometrics is growing in popularity, despite limited support for its efficacy. In pre- and early pubertal children, the study of complex training has been limited, and to our knowledge an examination of its effect on anaerobic performance characteristics of the upper and lower body has not been undertaken. Furthermore, the effect of detraining after complex training requires clarification. The physical characteristics (mean+/-s) of the 54 male participants in the present study were as follows: age 12.3 +/- 0.3 years, height 1.57 +/- 0.07 m, body mass 50.3 +/- 11.0 kg. Participants were randomly assigned to an experimental (n = 33) or control group (n = 21). The training, which was performed three times a week for 12 weeks, included a combination of dynamic constant external resistance and plyometrics. After training, participants completed 12 weeks of detraining. At baseline, after training and after detraining, peak and mean anaerobic power, dynamic strength and athletic performance were assessed. Twenty-six participants completed the training and none reported any training-related injury. Complex training was associated with small increases (< or =5.5%) in peak and mean power during training, followed by decreases of a similar magnitude (< or = -5.9%) during detraining (P < 0.05). No changes or minor, progressive increases (< or =1.5%) were evident in the control group (P > 0.05). In the experimental group, dynamic strength was increased by 24.3 - 71.4% (dependent on muscle group; P < 0.01), whereas growth-related changes in the control group varied from 0 to 4.4% (P > 0.05). For 40-m sprint running, basketball chest pass and vertical jump test performance, the experimental group saw a small improvement (< or =4.0%) after training followed by a decline (< or = -4.4%) towards baseline during detraining (P < 0.05), whereas the control group experienced no change (P > 0.05). In conclusion, in pre- and early pubertal boys, upper and lower body complex training is a time-effective and safe training modality that confers small improvements in anaerobic power and jumping, throwing and sprinting performance, and marked improvements in dynamic strength. However, after detraining, the benefits of complex training are lost at similar rates to other training modalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16882633     DOI: 10.1080/02640410500457117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  19 in total

1.  Effects of a daily school based physical activity intervention program on muscle development in prepubertal girls.

Authors:  Susanna Stenevi-Lundgren; Robin M Daly; Christian Lindén; Per Gärdsell; Magnus K Karlsson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  A Review of the Promotion of Fitness Measures and Health Outcomes in Youth.

Authors:  Dave Stodden; Ryan Sacko; Danielle Nesbitt
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2015-12-01

3.  Effects of Plyometric Training on Neuromuscular Performance in Youth Basketball Players: A Pilot Study on the Influence of Drill Randomization.

Authors:  Sebastian Hernández; Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo; Cristian Álvarez; Javier Sanchez-Sanchez; Jason Moran; Lucas A Pereira; Irineu Loturco
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Effects of a physical activity intervention on schoolchildren fitness.

Authors:  Antonio Di Maglie; Santo Marsigliante; Giulia My; Salvatore Colazzo; Antonella Muscella
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2022-01

Review 5.  School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18.

Authors:  Maureen Dobbins; Heather Husson; Kara DeCorby; Rebecca L LaRocca
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28

6.  A school-based exercise intervention program increases muscle strength in prepubertal boys.

Authors:  Susanna Stenevi-Lundgren; Robin M Daly; Magnus K Karlsson
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2010-06-22

7.  Effects of manual resistance training on fitness in adolescents.

Authors:  Sandor Dorgo; George A King; Norma G Candelaria; Julia O Bader; Gregory D Brickey; Carolyn E Adams
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  A 5-year exercise program in children improves muscle strength without affecting fracture risk.

Authors:  Jesper Fritz; Marcus E Cöster; Susanna Stenevi-Lundgren; Jan-Åke Nilsson; Magnus Dencker; Björn E Rosengren; Magnus K Karlsson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 9.  Trainability of young athletes and overtraining.

Authors:  Nuno Matos; Richard J Winsley
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

10.  Effect of adding plyometric training to physical education sessions on specific biomechanical parameters in primary school girls.

Authors:  Nadia L Radwan; Waleed S Mahmoud; Rasha A Mohamed; Marwa M Ibrahim
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.