PURPOSE: The aim was to study selective participation and its effect on prevalence estimates in a health survey of affected residents 3 weeks after a man-made disaster in The Netherlands (May 13, 2000). METHODS: All affected adult residents were invited to participate. Survey (questionnaire) data were combined with electronic medical records of residents' general practitioners (GPs). Data for demographics, relocation, utilization, and morbidity 1 year predisaster and 1 year postdisaster were used. RESULTS: The survey participation rate was 26% (N = 1171). Women (odds ratio [OR], 1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-1.67), those living with a partner (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.72-2.33), those aged 45 to 64 years (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.59-2.52), and immigrants (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.30-1.74) were more likely to participate. Participation rate was not affected by relocation because of the disaster. Participants in the survey consulted their GPs for health problems in the year before and after the disaster more often than nonparticipants. Although there was selective participation, multiple imputation barely affected prevalence estimates of health problems in the survey 3 weeks postdisaster. CONCLUSIONS: Estimating actual selection bias in disaster studies gives better information about the study representativeness. This is important for policy making and providing effective health care.
PURPOSE: The aim was to study selective participation and its effect on prevalence estimates in a health survey of affected residents 3 weeks after a man-made disaster in The Netherlands (May 13, 2000). METHODS: All affected adult residents were invited to participate. Survey (questionnaire) data were combined with electronic medical records of residents' general practitioners (GPs). Data for demographics, relocation, utilization, and morbidity 1 year predisaster and 1 year postdisaster were used. RESULTS: The survey participation rate was 26% (N = 1171). Women (odds ratio [OR], 1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-1.67), those living with a partner (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.72-2.33), those aged 45 to 64 years (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.59-2.52), and immigrants (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.30-1.74) were more likely to participate. Participation rate was not affected by relocation because of the disaster. Participants in the survey consulted their GPs for health problems in the year before and after the disaster more often than nonparticipants. Although there was selective participation, multiple imputation barely affected prevalence estimates of health problems in the survey 3 weeks postdisaster. CONCLUSIONS: Estimating actual selection bias in disaster studies gives better information about the study representativeness. This is important for policy making and providing effective health care.
Authors: Bellis van den Berg; Peter G van der Velden; C Joris Yzermans; Rebecca K Stellato; Linda Grievink Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2006-10-11 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Bellis van den Berg; Peter van der Velden; Rebecca Stellato; Linda Grievink Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2007-02-15 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Erik R Svendsen; Jennifer R Runkle; Venkata Ramana Dhara; Shao Lin; Marina Naboka; Timothy A Mousseau; Charles Bennett Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2012-08-16 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Bellis van den Berg; Albert Wong; Peter G van der Velden; Hendriek C Boshuizen; Linda Grievink Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2012-09-18 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Dirk-Jan den Ouden; Peter G van der Velden; Linda Grievink; Mattijn Morren; Anja J E Dirkzwager; C Joris Yzermans Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2007-07-24 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Bellis van den Berg; C Joris Yzermans; Peter G van der Velden; Rebecca K Stellato; Erik Lebret; Linda Grievink Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2007-09-21 Impact factor: 2.655