Literature DB >> 16882452

Implications of the initial mutations in membrane cofactor protein (MCP; CD46) leading to atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome.

Anna Richards1, M Kathryn Liszewski, David Kavanagh, Celia J Fang, Elizabeth Moulton, Veronique Fremeaux-Bacchi, Giuseppe Remuzzi, Marina Noris, Timothy H J Goodship, John P Atkinson.   

Abstract

The hemolytic uremic syndrome is characterized by the triad of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia and acute renal failure. There are two general types. One occurs in epidemic form and is diarrheal associated (D+HUS). It has a good prognosis. The second is a rare form known as atypical (aHUS), which may be familial or sporadic, and has a poor prognosis. aHUS is increasingly recognized to be a disease of defective complement regulation, particularly cofactor activity. Mutations in membrane cofactor protein (MCP; CD46) that predispose to the development of aHUS were first identified in 2003. MCP is a membrane-bound complement regulator that acts as a cofactor for the factor I-mediated cleavage of C3b and C4b deposited on host cells. More than 20 different mutations in MCP have now been identified in patients with aHUS. Many of these mutants have been functionally characterized and have helped to define the pathogenic mechanisms leading to aHUS development. Over 75% of the reported mutations cause a reduction in MCP expression, due to homozygous, compound heterozygous or heterozygous mutations. This deficiency of MCP leads to inadequate control of complement activation on endothelial cells after an initiating injury. The remaining MCP mutants are expressed, but demonstrate reduced ligand (C3b/C4b) binding capacity and cofactor activity of MCP. MCP mutations in aHUS demonstrate incomplete penetrance, indicating that additional genetic and environmental factors are required to manifest disease. MCP mutants as a cause of aHUS have a favorable clinical outcome in comparison to patients with factor H (CFH) or factor I (IF) mutations. In 90% of the renal transplants performed in patients with MCP-HUS, there has been no recurrence of the primary disease, whilst >50% of factor I or factor H deficient patients have had a prompt recurrence. This highlights the importance of defining and characterizing the underlying genetic defects in patients with aHUS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16882452     DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2006.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Immunol        ISSN: 0161-5890            Impact factor:   4.407


  50 in total

1.  Thrombotic microangiopathy: atypical HUS: current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  Alejandra Rosales; Magdalena Riedl; Lothar B Zimmerhackl
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 28.314

2.  Smallpox inhibitor of complement enzymes (SPICE): dissecting functional sites and abrogating activity.

Authors:  M Kathryn Liszewski; Marilyn K Leung; Richard Hauhart; Celia J Fang; Paula Bertram; John P Atkinson
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  Combined complement gene mutations in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome influence clinical phenotype.

Authors:  Elena Bresin; Erica Rurali; Jessica Caprioli; Pilar Sanchez-Corral; Veronique Fremeaux-Bacchi; Santiago Rodriguez de Cordoba; Sheila Pinto; Timothy H J Goodship; Marta Alberti; David Ribes; Elisabetta Valoti; Giuseppe Remuzzi; Marina Noris
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  A novel CD46 mutation in a patient with microangiopathy clinically resembling thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and normal ADAMTS13 activity.

Authors:  Raffaella Rossio; Luca Andrea Lotta; Silvia Pontiggia; Nicolò Ghiringhelli Borsa; Isabella Garagiola; Gianluigi Ardissino; Danijela Mikovic; Massimo Cugno; Flora Peyvandi
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 5.  Complement System: a Neglected Pathway in Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Anne Bordron; Cristina Bagacean; Adrian Tempescul; Christian Berthou; Eléonore Bettacchioli; Sophie Hillion; Yves Renaudineau
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 8.667

6.  Two cases of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA): a possible relationship.

Authors:  Mercedes Cao; Tamara Ferreiro; Bruna N Leite; Francisco Pita; Luis Bolaños; Francisco Valdés; Angel Alonso; Eduardo Vázquez; Juan Mosquera; María Trigás; Santiago Rodríguez
Journal:  CEN Case Rep       Date:  2017-03-01

Review 7.  Hemolytic uremic syndrome.

Authors:  Caterina Mele; Giuseppe Remuzzi; Marina Noris
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 9.623

8.  CD46-associated atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome with uncommon course caused by cblC deficiency.

Authors:  Antonia H Bouts; Marcus T R Roofthooft; Gajja S Salomons; Jean-Claude Davin
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 9.  Genetics and complement in atypical HUS.

Authors:  David Kavanagh; Tim Goodship
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2010-06-06       Impact factor: 3.714

10.  Mouse CD4+ CD25+ T regulatory cells are protected from autologous complement mediated injury by Crry and CD59.

Authors:  Qing Li; Kristine Nacion; Hong Bu; Feng Lin
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 3.575

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.