BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the effects of a 'centralized intensive education system' (CIES) in terms of acquiring a proper clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC) technique by patients with voiding dysfunction. METHODS: Between March 2002 and March 2003, we prospectively and consecutively enrolled 132 hospitalized patients who learnt and started CISC for the first time due to voiding dysfunction. Patients were enrolled either of two groups (the CIES group vs the 'individualized ward education system'[IWES] group) at the time of the urologic consultation for voiding dysfunction. Out of 132 patients who enrolled in the study, 112 (45 males and 67 females, mean age 57.3 with a range of 18-81) were included in the primary analyses. The questionnaire was applied immediately before discharge. RESULTS: There were similar patient demographics and clinical parameters for the CIES (n = 62) and the IWES groups (n = 50). Of 10 items including the methodology of CISC, six items discriminated significantly in favor of the CIES (P < 0.05). The patient satisfaction with CISC education was significantly different for the two groups in terms of response to the questionnaire. The CIES group was found to be more satisfied with the education received than the IWES group (P < 0.05). Moreover, the number of trials to gain confidence to perform CISC in CIES group was significantly fewer than that of IWES group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that CIES might be a superior training program for the patients with voiding dysfunction to acquire a proper CISC technique to the conventional IWES.
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the effects of a 'centralized intensive education system' (CIES) in terms of acquiring a proper clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC) technique by patients with voiding dysfunction. METHODS: Between March 2002 and March 2003, we prospectively and consecutively enrolled 132 hospitalized patients who learnt and started CISC for the first time due to voiding dysfunction. Patients were enrolled either of two groups (the CIES group vs the 'individualized ward education system'[IWES] group) at the time of the urologic consultation for voiding dysfunction. Out of 132 patients who enrolled in the study, 112 (45 males and 67 females, mean age 57.3 with a range of 18-81) were included in the primary analyses. The questionnaire was applied immediately before discharge. RESULTS: There were similar patient demographics and clinical parameters for the CIES (n = 62) and the IWES groups (n = 50). Of 10 items including the methodology of CISC, six items discriminated significantly in favor of the CIES (P < 0.05). The patient satisfaction with CISC education was significantly different for the two groups in terms of response to the questionnaire. The CIES group was found to be more satisfied with the education received than the IWES group (P < 0.05). Moreover, the number of trials to gain confidence to perform CISC in CIES group was significantly fewer than that of IWES group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that CIES might be a superior training program for the patients with voiding dysfunction to acquire a proper CISC technique to the conventional IWES.
Authors: Jessica D Lubahn; Lee C Zhao; J Francis Scott; Steven J Hudak; Justin Chee; Ryan Terlecki; Benjamin Breyer; Allen F Morey Journal: J Urol Date: 2013-06-29 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Andrei Krassioukov; Yasuhiko Igawa; Márcio Augusto Averbeck; Helmut Madersbacher; Andrew J Lloyd; Mette Bøgelund; Nikesh Thiruchelvam Journal: Med Devices (Auckl) Date: 2018-10-01
Authors: Andrew J Cohen; Philip J Cheng; Sikai Song; German Patino; Jeremy B Myers; Samit S Roy; Sean P Elliott; Joseph Pariser; Justin Drobish; Brad A Erickson; Thomas W Fuller; Jill C Buckley; Alex J Vanni; Nima Baradaran; Benjamin N Breyer Journal: Transl Androl Urol Date: 2021-05