Literature DB >> 16882024

Dopamine neuronal responses in monkeys performing visually cued reward schedules.

Sabrina Ravel1, Barry J Richmond.   

Abstract

Dopamine neurons are important for reward-related behaviours. They have been recorded during classical conditioning and operant tasks with stochastic reward delivery. However, daily behaviour, although frequently complex in the number of steps, is often very predictable. We studied the responses of 75 dopamine neurons during schedules of trials in which the events and related reward contingencies could be well-predicted, within and across trials. In this visually cued reward schedule task, a visual cue tells the monkeys exactly how many trials, 1, 2, 3, or 4, must be performed to obtain a reward. The number of errors became larger as the number of trials remaining before the reward increased. Dopamine neurons frequently responded to the cues at the beginning and end of the schedules. Approximately 75% of the first-cue responsive neurons did not distinguish among the schedules that were beginning even though the cues were different. Approximately half of the last-cue responsive neurons depended on which schedule was ending, even though the cue signalling the last trial was the same in all schedules. Thus, the responses were related to what the monkey knew about the relation between the cues and the schedules, not the identity of the cues. These neurons also frequently responded to the go signal and/or to the OK signal indicating the end of a correctly performed trial whether a reward was forthcoming or not, and to the reward itself. Thus, dopamine neurons seem to respond to behaviourally important, i.e. salient, events even when the events have been well-predicted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16882024     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04905.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  17 in total

1.  The prefrontal cortex and hybrid learning during iterative competitive games.

Authors:  Hiroshi Abe; Hyojung Seo; Daeyeol Lee
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Encoding of reward expectation by monkey anterior insular neurons.

Authors:  Takashi Mizuhiki; Barry J Richmond; Munetaka Shidara
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Dopamine in motivational control: rewarding, aversive, and alerting.

Authors:  Ethan S Bromberg-Martin; Masayuki Matsumoto; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Cue and reward signals carried by monkey entorhinal cortex neurons during reward schedules.

Authors:  Yasuko Sugase-Miyamoto; Barry J Richmond
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Relation of locus coeruleus neurons in monkeys to Pavlovian and operant behaviors.

Authors:  Sebastien Bouret; Barry J Richmond
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Injection parameters and virus dependent choice of promoters to improve neuron targeting in the nonhuman primate brain.

Authors:  W Lerchner; B Corgiat; V Der Minassian; R C Saunders; B J Richmond
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 5.250

7.  Dopamine neurons learn to encode the long-term value of multiple future rewards.

Authors:  Kazuki Enomoto; Naoyuki Matsumoto; Sadamu Nakai; Takemasa Satoh; Tatsuo K Sato; Yasumasa Ueda; Hitoshi Inokawa; Masahiko Haruno; Minoru Kimura
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Dopamine-associated cached values are not sufficient as the basis for action selection.

Authors:  Nick G Hollon; Monica M Arnold; Jerylin O Gan; Mark E Walton; Paul E M Phillips
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Comparing the role of the anterior cingulate cortex and 6-hydroxydopamine nucleus accumbens lesions on operant effort-based decision making.

Authors:  Mark E Walton; James Groves; Katie A Jennings; Paula L Croxson; Trevor Sharp; Matthew F S Rushworth; David M Bannerman
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Effort-based cost-benefit valuation and the human brain.

Authors:  Paula L Croxson; Mark E Walton; Jill X O'Reilly; Timothy E J Behrens; Matthew F S Rushworth
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.