Literature DB >> 16881883

A weight gain chart for pregnant women designed in Chile.

Francisco Mardones1, Pedro Rosso.   

Abstract

The weight gain chart for pregnant women, developed by Rosso and Mardones (RM chart, 1997), is analysed and compared with other charts in terms of its usefulness for targeting nutritional interventions aimed at preventing low or high birth weights. The RM chart defines categories of maternal nutritional status in early gestation based on weight/height, expressed either as percentage of standard weight (PSW) or body mass index (BMI), and desirable gestational weight gains for each of these categories. Weight gain recommendations of the RM chart are proportional to maternal height. For underweight women the weight recommendation was derived from actual data, while for overweight and obese women it is based on data extrapolations. Since 1987 the Chilean National Health Service has used the RM chart as a standard in prenatal care in all its clinics, covering approximately 70% of the country's population, mostly middle and low income women. During the 1987-2001 period the proportion of underweight pregnant women and infants with birth weight < 3000 g decreased significantly and proportionally. Nevertheless, the proportion of obese pregnant women and infants with birth weight > or = 4000 g increased during this period. Multifactorial social changes including a decade of substantial economic growth in the country with improved family income, precludes the possibility of determining the efficacy of the RM chart in this group. However, the widespread use of the RM chart indicates that it is a helpful and easy-to-use instrument in the field. Further, by its clear graphical presentation of maternal nutritional status it helps draw the attention of health personnel to women who need special nutritional advice and support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16881883      PMCID: PMC6860947          DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2005.00013.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Nutr        ISSN: 1740-8695            Impact factor:   3.092


  27 in total

1.  Risk factors for low birthweight in north-east Brazil: the role of caesarean section.

Authors:  A A Silva; F Lamy-Filho; M T Alves; L C Coimbra; H Bettiol; M A Barbieri
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.980

2.  Anthropometry in clinical appraisal of nutritional status.

Authors:  S M Garn
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1962-11       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Clinical significance of weight trends during pregnancy.

Authors:  W C BILLEWICZ; A M THOMSON
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1957-02-02

4.  An empiric evaluation of the Institute of Medicine's pregnancy weight gain guidelines by race.

Authors:  L A Schieve; M E Cogswell; K S Scanlon
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 5.  Nutritional interventions to prevent intrauterine growth retardation: evidence from randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  M de Onis; J Villar; M Gülmezoglu
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Randomized controlled trial to prevent excessive weight gain in pregnant women.

Authors:  B A Polley; R R Wing; C J Sims
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2002-11

7.  Prenatal weight gain advice: an examination of the recent prenatal weight gain recommendations of the Institute of Medicine.

Authors:  J D Parker; B Abrams
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  [A socioeconomic evaluation of the delivery of "Purita" milk to pregnant women in Chile].

Authors:  F Mardones; R Zamora
Journal:  Rev Med Chil       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 0.553

9.  Anthropometric assessment of nutritional status in pregnant women: a reference table of weight-for-height by week of pregnancy.

Authors:  M Gueri; P Jutsum; B Sorhaindo
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  [Anemia in pregnant women from the community of Puente Alto, Chile].

Authors:  Francisco Mardones; Alonso Rioseco; Mauricio Ocqueteau; María Teresa Urrutia; Lorena Javet; Iván Rojas; Luis Villarroel del
Journal:  Rev Med Chil       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 0.553

View more
  7 in total

1.  Pelvic floor muscle strength in primigravidae and non-pregnant nulliparous women: a comparative study.

Authors:  Vanessa P Palmezoni; Marília D Santos; Janser M Pereira; Bruno T Bernardes; Vanessa S Pereira-Baldon; Ana Paula M Resende
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Absence of disparities in anthropometric measures among Chilean indigenous and non-indigenous newborns.

Authors:  Hugo Amigo; Patricia Bustos; Jay S Kaufman
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Impaired executive function mediates the association between maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index and child ADHD symptoms.

Authors:  Claudia Buss; Sonja Entringer; Elysia Poggi Davis; Calvin J Hobel; James M Swanson; Pathik D Wadhwa; Curt A Sandman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  On the Study of Pre-Pregnancy Body Mass Index (BMI) and Weight Gain as Indicators of Nutritional Status of Pregnant Women Belonging to Low Socio-Economic Category: A Study from Assam.

Authors:  Lipi B Mahanta; Manisha Choudhury; Arundhuti Devi; Arunima Bhattacharya
Journal:  Indian J Community Med       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

5.  Gestational weight gain and fetal growth in underweight women.

Authors:  Vincenzo Zanardo; Alessandro Mazza; Matteo Parotto; Giovanni Scambia; Gianluca Straface
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.638

6.  No global consensus: a cross-sectional survey of maternal weight policies.

Authors:  Courtney Scott; Christopher T Andersen; Natali Valdez; Francisco Mardones; Ellen A Nohr; Lucilla Poston; Katharina C Quack Loetscher; Barbara Abrams
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Pre-pregnancy BMI-specific optimal gestational weight gain for women in Japan.

Authors:  Naho Morisaki; Chie Nagata; Seung Chik Jwa; Haruhiko Sago; Shigeru Saito; Emily Oken; Takeo Fujiwara
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.211

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.