Literature DB >> 16880876

Effectiveness of protective measures in reducing risk of radiation exposure in interventional pain management: a prospective evaluation.

Laxmaiah Manchikanti1, Kim A Cash, Tammy L Moss, Vidyasagar Pampati.   

Abstract

It is estimated that over 50% of approximately 4 million interventional procedures performed annually in the United States are performed utilizing fluoroscopy. Fluoroscopy offers validity to interventional techniques by providing precise localization of anatomic target areas and facilitating accurate delivery of injectate. Exposure to ionizing radiation is an unavoidable consequence while performing fluoroscopic procedures. The primary source of radiation to the physician during interventional procedures is from scatter reflected back from the patient. Multiple investigators have prospectively evaluated radiation exposure to the physician performing fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures in various settings, with varying results. This prospective controlled study was undertaken to evaluate scatter radiation risk of whole body exposure and protective measures to reduce scatter radiation in the upper and lower parts of the body in fluoroscopically guided interventional techniques. Five hundred consecutive patients, undergoing interventional procedures, in an ambulatory surgery setting were studied. The mode utilized varied from pulsed-imaging to continuous fluoroscopic imaging. All the protective measures were incorporated, including lead shielding from the table to the floor covering the entire area of the beam. Scatter radiation exposure was monitored in 5 areas with 3 badges inside the apron and 2 outside the apron. Results of this study showed an average exposure per patient of 8.9 -/+ 0.4 seconds and per procedure of 4.9 -/+ 0.11 seconds. Scatter radiation exposure was higher outside the lead aprons compared to inside the lead aprons. Scatter radiation exposure at groin level was similar with or without lead shielding from the table to the floor.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 16880876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Physician        ISSN: 1533-3159            Impact factor:   4.965


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of radiation exposure to physicians between anteroposterior and lateral real-time fluoroscopy when performing lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Seung Hee Yoo; Won-Joong Kim; Mi Jin Jue; Min Jin Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  Complications and pitfalls of lumbar interlaminar and transforaminal epidural injections.

Authors:  Bradly S Goodman; Lyle W F Posecion; Srinivas Mallempati; Matt Bayazitoglu
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2008-08-15

Review 3.  Radiation safety: a focus on lead aprons and thyroid shields in interventional pain management.

Authors:  Bo Kyung Cheon; Cho Long Kim; Ka Ram Kim; Min Hye Kang; Jeong Ae Lim; Nam Sik Woo; Ka Young Rhee; Hae Kyoung Kim; Jae Hun Kim
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2018-10-01

4.  Impact of flow pattern, body mass index, and age on intraprocedural fluoroscopic time and radiation dose during sacroiliac joint injections.

Authors:  Christin A Tiegs-Heiden; Naveen S Murthy; Jennifer R Geske; Felix E Diehn; Vance T Lehman; Greta B Liebo; Jared T Verdoorn; Carrie M Carr; Gavin A McKenzie
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2021-03-08

5.  Factors Affecting Radiation Exposure during Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection: A Prospective Study in 759 Patients.

Authors:  Suyoung Kim; Joon-Ho Shin; Joon Woo Lee; Heung Sik Kang; Guen Young Lee; Joong Mo Ahn
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.500

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.