Literature DB >> 16880458

Improving blood pressure control through provider education, provider alerts, and patient education: a cluster randomized trial.

Christianne L Roumie1, Tom A Elasy, Robert Greevy, Marie R Griffin, Xulei Liu, William J Stone, Kenneth A Wallston, Robert S Dittus, Vincent Alvarez, Janice Cobb, Theodore Speroff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inadequate blood pressure control is a persistent gap in quality care.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate provider and patient interventions to improve blood pressure control.
DESIGN: Cluster randomized, controlled trial.
SETTING: 2 hospital-based and 8 community-based clinics in the Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System. PATIENTS: 1341 veterans with essential hypertension cared for by 182 providers. Eligible patients had 2 or more blood pressure measurements greater than 140/90 mm Hg in a 6-month period and were taking a single antihypertensive agent. INTERVENTION: Providers who cared for eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive an e-mail with a Web-based link to the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC 7) guidelines (provider education); provider education and a patient-specific hypertension computerized alert (provider education and alert); or provider education, hypertension alert, and patient education, in which patients were sent a letter advocating drug adherence, lifestyle modification, and conversations with providers (patient education). MEASUREMENTS: Proportion of patients with a systolic blood pressure less than 140 mm Hg at 6 months; intensification of antihypertensive medication.
RESULTS: Mean baseline blood pressure was 157/83 mm Hg with no differences between groups (P = 0.105). Six-month follow-up data were available for 975 patients (73%). Patients of providers who were randomly assigned to the patient education group had better blood pressure control (138/75 mm Hg) than those in the provider education and alert or provider education alone groups (146/76 mm Hg and 145/78 mm Hg, respectively). More patients in the patient education group had a systolic blood pressure of 140 mm Hg or less compared with those in the provider education or provider education and alert groups (adjusted relative risk for the patient education group compared with the provider education alone group, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.06 to 1.62]; P = 0.012). LIMITATIONS: Follow-up blood pressure measurements were missing for 27% of study patients. The study could not detect a mechanism by which patient education improved blood pressure control.
CONCLUSIONS: A multifactorial intervention including patient education improved blood pressure control compared with provider education alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16880458     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-3-200608010-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  89 in total

1.  Does Clinical Inertia Vary According to Provider Type?

Authors:  Daniel G Federman; Kirsha S Gordon; Joseph Goulet; Sue Kancir; Woody Levin; Shawn L Fultz; Amy C Justice
Journal:  Fed Pract       Date:  2008

2.  Is awareness of chronic kidney disease associated with evidence-based guideline-concordant outcomes?

Authors:  Delphine S Tuot; Laura C Plantinga; Chi-yuan Hsu; Neil R Powe
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.754

3.  Translation of evidence-based guidelines in preventive cardiology: the EUROACTION program.

Authors:  Thomas A Pearson
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2008-10-21

4.  Death toll from uncontrolled blood pressure in ethnic populations: universal access and quality improvement may not be enough.

Authors:  Crystal Wiley Cené; Lisa A Cooper
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Hypertension improvement project: randomized trial of quality improvement for physicians and lifestyle modification for patients.

Authors:  Laura P Svetkey; Kathryn I Pollak; William S Yancy; Rowena J Dolor; Bryan C Batch; Greg Samsa; David B Matchar; Pao-Hwa Lin
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 10.190

6.  Medication adherence: WHO cares?

Authors:  Marie T Brown; Jennifer K Bussell
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 7.  Effect of point-of-care computer reminders on physician behaviour: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kaveh G Shojania; Alison Jennings; Alain Mayhew; Craig Ramsay; Martin Eccles; Jeremy Grimshaw
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Counseling African Americans to Control Hypertension: cluster-randomized clinical trial main effects.

Authors:  Gbenga Ogedegbe; Jonathan N Tobin; Senaida Fernandez; Andrea Cassells; Marleny Diaz-Gloster; Chamanara Khalida; Thomas Pickering; Joseph E Schwartz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  A multifaceted intervention to improve blood pressure control: The Guideline Adherence for Heart Health (GLAD) study.

Authors:  Denise E Bonds; Patricia E Hogan; Alain G Bertoni; Haiying Chen; C Randall Clinch; Ann E Hiott; Erica L Rosenberger; David C Goff
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  The SQUIRE (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines for quality improvement reporting: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  G Ogrinc; S E Mooney; C Estrada; T Foster; D Goldmann; L W Hall; M M Huizinga; S K Liu; P Mills; J Neily; W Nelson; P J Pronovost; L Provost; L V Rubenstein; T Speroff; M Splaine; R Thomson; A M Tomolo; B Watts
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2008-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.