Literature DB >> 16879460

Risk factors for failure to extend labor epidural analgesia to epidural anesthesia for Cesarean section.

S Orbach-Zinger1, L Friedman, A Avramovich, N Ilgiaeva, R Orvieto, J Sulkes, L A Eidelman.   

Abstract

AIM: To identify parturients at risk of inability to extend labor epidural analgesia in whom alternative methods of anesthesia should be considered for Cesarean section (CS).
METHODS: For 6 months, we prospectively studied women undergoing CS with a functioning epidural catheter in place from the delivery ward. All parturients received the same epidural protocol: bolus of bupivacaine 0.1% and fentanyl, followed by bupivacaine 0.1% and fentanyl (2 microg/ml) 10-15 ml/h and an additional 5 ml of bupivacaine 0.125% as top-up according to patient request. Sixteen milliliters of lidocaine 2%, 1 ml of bicarbonate and 100 microg of fentanyl were given for CS. Failed epidural analgesia was defined as the need to convert to general anesthesia.
RESULTS: Of the 101 parturients studied, 20 (19.8%) required conversion to general anesthesia. In univariate analysis, the likelihood of failed epidural anesthesia was inversely correlated with parturient age (P = 0.014) and directly correlated with pre-pregnancy weight (P = 0.019), weight at the end of pregnancy (P = 0.003), body mass index at the end of pregnancy (P = 0.0004), gestational week (P = 0.008), number of top-ups (P = 0.0004) and visual analog scale (VAS) score 2 h before CS (P = 0.03). In multivariate analysis, the number of top-ups in the delivery ward was the best predictor of epidural anesthesia failure (odds ratio, 4.39; P = 0.005).
CONCLUSION: Younger, more obese parturients at a higher gestational week, requiring more top-ups during labor and having a higher VAS score in the 2 h before CS are at risk for inability to extend labor epidural analgesia to epidural anesthesia for CS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16879460     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01083.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  5 in total

1.  Increasing body mass index predicts increasing difficulty, failure rate, and time to discovery of failure of epidural anesthesia in laboring patients.

Authors:  Ayse O Kula; Matthias L Riess; Elizabeth H Ellinas
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 9.452

2.  Risk factors for labor epidural conversion failure requiring general anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Shannon M Grap; Gaurav R Patel; Jessica Huang; Sonia J Vaida
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-10-13

3.  Maternal Body Mass Index and Use of Labor Neuraxial Analgesia: A Population-based Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Alexander J Butwick; Cynthia A Wong; Nan Guo
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Intraluminal obstruction of epidural catheter due to manufacturing defect.

Authors:  Prasad K Kulkarni; Vittal A Pai; Riddhi P Shah; Sriranga R Joshi
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-04

5.  What is the failure rate in extending labour analgesia in patients with a body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m(2)compared with patients with a body mass index < 30 kg/m(2)? a retrospective pilot study.

Authors:  Victoria A Eley; Andre van Zundert; Leonie Callaway
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 2.217

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.