Literature DB >> 16879094

Non-traumatic spinal cord injury: what is the ideal setting for rehabilitation?

Peter W New1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To survey rehabilitation physicians about management of patients with non-traumatic spinal cord injury (NTSCI).
METHODS: Postal and email survey of Australian physicians treating adult inpatients in neurological rehabilitation or Spinal Injury Units (SIUs). 59/69 returned surveys met inclusion criteria. 75% (44) of respondents were from neurological rehabilitation units (response rate 72%) and 25% (15) were from SIUs (response rate 94%). Outcomes were: incidence of NTSCI, opinion regarding ideal setting for NTSCI inpatient rehabilitation, and availability of key services for NTSCI patients in neurological rehabilitation units.
RESULTS: Estimated incidence of NTSCI was 26/million adults/year. 60% of NTSCI patients were managed in general neurological rehabilitation units. The majority of respondents (85% (50/59); 95% CI, 73%-92%) believed that the most appropriate setting for NTSCI rehabilitation was either an SIU or a neurological team that specialises in NTSCI patients. Neurological rehabilitation units offered NTSCI patients the following services: education regarding coping with NTSCI and preventing complications (55% [18/33]); specialised wheelchair and seating prescription (85% [28/33]); Environmental Control Unit training (36% [12/33]); and bladder training (97% [32/33]).
CONCLUSIONS: The most appropriate setting for rehabilitation of NTSCI patients is either a dedicated SIU or a neurological rehabilitation team that specialises in NTSCI. The organisation of inpatient rehabilitation services for NTSCI patients in Australia should be improved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16879094     DOI: 10.1071/ah060353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Health Rev        ISSN: 0156-5788            Impact factor:   1.990


  7 in total

1.  Survival after non-traumatic spinal cord injury: evidence from a population-based rehabilitation cohort in Switzerland.

Authors:  A Buzzell; J D Chamberlain; H P Gmünder; K Hug; X Jordan; M Schubert; M W G Brinkhof
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 2.  Rehabilitation of people with spinal cord damage due to tumor: literature review, international survey and practical recommendations for optimizing their rehabilitation.

Authors:  Peter Wayne New; Ruth Marshall; Michael D Stubblefield; Giorgio Scivoletto
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 3.  What to call spinal cord damage not due to trauma? Implications for literature searching.

Authors:  Peter W New; Veronica Delafosse
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Rehabilitation of patients with nontraumatic spinal cord injury in the Netherlands: etiology, length of stay, and functional outcome.

Authors:  Jolien J Vervoordeldonk; Marcel W M Post; Peter New; M Clin Epi; Floris W A Van Asbeck
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2013

5.  Neurogenic Bladder and Urodynamic Outcomes in Patients with Spinal Cord Myelopathy.

Authors:  Peter W New; Louise Dillon
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2015-07-29

Review 6.  Important Clinical Rehabilitation Principles Unique to People with Non-traumatic Spinal Cord Dysfunction.

Authors:  Peter Wayne New; Inge Eriks-Hoogland; Giorgio Scivoletto; Ronald K Reeves; Andrea Townson; Ruth Marshall; Farooq A Rathore
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2017

7.  Satisfaction with life, health and well-being: comparison between non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction, traumatic spinal cord injury and Australian norms.

Authors:  Linda Barclay; Peter W New; Prue E Morgan; Sara J T Guilcher
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2019-05-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.