Literature DB >> 16877733

Phase II trial of tipifarnib in patients with recurrent malignant glioma either receiving or not receiving enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs: a North American Brain Tumor Consortium Study.

Timothy F Cloughesy1, Patrick Y Wen, H Ian Robins, Susan M Chang, Morris D Groves, Karen L Fink, Larry Junck, David Schiff, Lauren Abrey, Mark R Gilbert, Frank Lieberman, John Kuhn, Lisa M DeAngelis, Minesh Mehta, Jeff J Raizer, W K Alfred Yung, Ken Aldape, John Wright, Kathleen R Lamborn, Michael D Prados.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A phase II study was undertaken in patients with recurrent malignant glioma to determine the efficacy and safety of tipifarnib, a farnesyltransferase inhibitor, dosed at the respective maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) for patients receiving and not receiving enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs). Because tipifarnib undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism, MTD is doubled in patients on EIAEDs. The population included 67 patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and an exploratory group of 22 patients with anaplastic glioma (AG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received tipifarnib (300 and 600 mg bid for 21 days every 4 weeks in non-EIAED and EIAED patients, respectively). All patients were assessable for efficacy and safety.
RESULTS: Two AG patients (9.1%) and eight GBM patients (11.9%) had progression-free survival (PFS) more than 6 months. Among the latter eight GBM patients, six of 36 patients (16.7%; 95% CI, 7% to 32%) were not receiving EIAEDs and two of 31 patients (6.5%; 95% CI, 1% to 20%) were receiving EIAEDs. Four patients had partial responses in group A GBM and one patient had a partial response group B GBM. An exploratory comparison of PFS between GBM groups A and B was statistically significant (P = .01). Patients not receiving EIAEDs had a higher incidence and increased severity of hematologic events. However, the incidence and severity of rash (the previously determined dose-limiting toxicity in patients receiving EIAEDs) seemed similar in EIAED and non-EIAED subgroups.
CONCLUSION: Tipifarnib (300 mg bid for 21 days every 4 weeks) shows modest evidence of activity in patients with recurrent GBM who are not receiving EIAEDs and is generally well tolerated in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16877733     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.2323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  39 in total

Review 1.  Novel delivery strategies for glioblastoma.

Authors:  Jiangbing Zhou; Kofi-Buaku Atsina; Benjamin T Himes; Garth W Strohbehn; W Mark Saltzman
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 2.  Neurotoxicity of biologically targeted agents in pediatric cancer trials.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Wells; Amulya A Nageswara Rao; Joseph Scafidi; Roger J Packer
Journal:  Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.372

3.  CNS Anticancer Drug Discovery and Development Conference White Paper.

Authors:  Victor A Levin; Peter J Tonge; James M Gallo; Marc R Birtwistle; Arvin C Dar; Antonio Iavarone; Patrick J Paddison; Timothy P Heffron; William F Elmquist; Jean E Lachowicz; Ted W Johnson; Forest M White; Joohee Sul; Quentin R Smith; Wang Shen; Jann N Sarkaria; Ramakrishna Samala; Patrick Y Wen; Donald A Berry; Russell C Petter
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 4.  Molecularly targeted therapies for malignant gliomas.

Authors:  Andreas A Argyriou; Haralabos P Kalofonos
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.354

5.  Phase 2 trial of erlotinib plus sirolimus in adults with recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  David A Reardon; Annick Desjardins; James J Vredenburgh; Sridharan Gururangan; Allan H Friedman; James E Herndon; Jennifer Marcello; Julie A Norfleet; Roger E McLendon; John H Sampson; Henry S Friedman
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 6.  Neurooncology clinical trial design for targeted therapies: lessons learned from the North American Brain Tumor Consortium.

Authors:  Susan M Chang; Kathleen R Lamborn; John G Kuhn; W K Alfred Yung; Mark R Gilbert; Patrick Y Wen; Howard A Fine; Minesh P Mehta; Lisa M DeAngelis; Frank S Lieberman; Timothy F Cloughesy; H Ian Robins; Lauren E Abrey; Michael D Prados
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 7.  Medical therapy of gliomas.

Authors:  Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Susan M Chang
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 8.  Molecularly targeted therapies for malignant glioma: rationale for combinatorial strategies.

Authors:  Nikhil G Thaker; Ian F Pollack
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.618

9.  The role side effects play in the choice of antiepileptic therapy in brain tumor-related epilepsy: a comparative study on traditional antiepileptic drugs versus oxcarbazepine.

Authors:  Marta Maschio; Loredana Dinapoli; Antonello Vidiri; Andrea Pace; Alessandra Fabi; Alfredo Pompili; Maria Carmine Carapella; Bruno Jandolo
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-05-06

10.  Current available therapies and future directions in the treatment of malignant gliomas.

Authors:  Annick Desjardins; David A Reardon; James J Vredenburgh
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2009-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.