Literature DB >> 16877720

Phase II trial of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and etoposide in advanced poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma: a Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network Study.

John D Hainsworth1, David R Spigel, Sharlene Litchy, F Anthony Greco.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of chemotherapy with paclitaxel, carboplatin, and etoposide in advanced adult poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients eligible for this multicenter, phase II trial had metastatic poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma and had received no previous treatment. Patients with a variety of known primary sites (excepting small-cell lung cancer) and patients with unknown primary site were eligible. Patients received four courses of chemotherapy with paclitaxel, carboplatin, and etoposide, administered at 3-week intervals. After completing four courses of treatment, patients with objective response or stable disease received three courses (24 weeks) of weekly paclitaxel.
RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were treated; 62% had unknown primary site. Forty-one patients (53%) had major responses (complete response rate, 15%), and five patients remain disease free from 18 to 66 months after therapy. Response rates were similar regardless of histology (small-cell v poorly differentiated carcinoma) or primary site. The median, 2-year, and 3-year survivals for the entire group were 14.5 months, 33%, and 24%, respectively. Myelosuppression was the major toxicity, as has been reported previously with this regimen.
CONCLUSION: This prospective phase II trial provides additional evidence that this family of relatively uncommon carcinomas is initially chemosensitive, with a high overall response rate to combination chemotherapy and a minority of complete responses. The three-drug regimen evaluated in this trial is moderately toxic, and has no obvious efficacy advantages when compared with standard platinum/etoposide regimens. Treatment for advanced poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma should parallel treatments used for small-cell lung cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16877720     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.0575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  39 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary management of nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Rebecca M Minter; Diane M Simeone
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  NANETS treatment guidelines: well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the stomach and pancreas.

Authors:  Matthew H Kulke; Lowell B Anthony; David L Bushnell; Wouter W de Herder; Stanley J Goldsmith; David S Klimstra; Stephen J Marx; Janice L Pasieka; Rodney F Pommier; James C Yao; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.327

3.  Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma arising from a gastritis cystica polyposa.

Authors:  Ryusaku Kusunoki; Hirofumi Fujishiro; Yuji Onoda; Shinsuke Suemitsu; Aya Fujiwara; Kousuke Tsukano; Satoshi Kotani; Daisuke Kuroki; Sayaka Ogawa; Satoshi Yamanouchi; Masahito Aimi; Satoko Ito; Youichi Miyaoka; Tatsuya Miyake; Naruaki Kohge; Tomonori Imaoka; Michio Takamura; Hideyuki Ohnuma; Shunji Ishihara; Yoshikazu Kinoshita
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-01-05

4.  A retrospective review of 126 high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  James D Smith; Diane L Reidy; Karyn A Goodman; Jinru Shia; Garrett M Nash
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Retrospective analysis of seventy-one patients with neuroendocrine tumor and review of the literature.

Authors:  Mutlu Dogan; Bulent Yalcin; Nuriye Yildirim Ozdemir; Ulku Yalcintas Arslan; Lutfi Dogan; Gungor Utkan; Hakan Akbulut; Nurullah Zengin; Necati Alkis; Fikri Icli
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Poorly differentiated neoplasms of unknown primary site: diagnostic usefulness of a molecular cancer classifier assay.

Authors:  F Anthony Greco; Wayne J Lennington; David R Spigel; John D Hainsworth
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.074

7.  Poorly-differentiated colorectal neuroendocrine tumour: CT differentiation from well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumour and poorly-differentiated adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Ji Hee Kang; Se Hyung Kim; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Biological characteristics and treatment outcomes of metastatic or recurrent neuroendocrine tumors: tumor grade and metastatic site are important for treatment strategy.

Authors:  Su-Jung Kim; Jin Won Kim; Sae-Won Han; Do-Youn Oh; Se-Hoon Lee; Dong-Wan Kim; Seock-Ah Im; Tae-You Kim; Dae Seog Heo; Yung-Jue Bang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Metastases in the Absence of a Primary Tumor: Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of CUP Syndrome.

Authors:  Kai Neben; Gerdt Hübner; Gunnar Folprecht; Dirk Jäger; Alwin Krämer
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 10.  Therapy of metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs): recent insights and advances.

Authors:  Tetsuhide Ito; Hisato Igarashi; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 7.527

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.