Literature DB >> 16877577

Should Chlamydia trachomatis confirmation make you cross? Performance of collection kits tested across three nucleic acid amplification test platforms.

S Scragg1, A Bingham, H Mallinson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of confirming initially reactive nucleic acid amplification assays for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) by cross testing on a second molecular platform. The three platforms investigated were Aptima Combo 2 assay (AC2), Cobas Amplicor CT test (PCR) and ProbeTec ET CT assay (SDA).
METHODS: Serial dilutions of a CT culture were prepared in 0.9% saline; used to prepare simulated swab samples for all three platforms, and tested as in the manufacturer's instructions. For the cross testing investigation, 1 ml of the simulated swab samples prepared in each of the three collection kits was transferred into the appropriate collection kit for the second platform.
RESULTS: AC2 demonstrated a higher analytical sensitivity than the SDA and PCR assays. Upon cross testing AC2 again demonstrated a superior performance to the SDA and PCR assays even when testing swab samples originally prepared in the SDA and PCR transport medium. The SDA assay was inhibited by the addition of transport medium from both the AC2 and PCR assays.
CONCLUSION: The analytical sensitivity of the three assays is not identical, therefore confirming initially reactive samples on a second platform may prove to be difficult. However, the higher sensitivity of the AC2 assay could allow its use as a confirmatory assay for reactive swab samples collected in the SDA and PCR transport medium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16877577      PMCID: PMC2564712          DOI: 10.1136/sti.2005.018614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN: 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


  5 in total

1.  Confirming positive results of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) for Chlamydia trachomatis: all NAATs are not created equal.

Authors:  J Schachter; E W Hook; D H Martin; D Willis; P Fine; D Fuller; J Jordan; W M Janda; M Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Screening tests to detect Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections--2002.

Authors:  Robert E Johnson; Wilbert J Newhall; John R Papp; Joan S Knapp; Carolyn M Black; Thomas L Gift; Richard Steece; Lauri E Markowitz; Owen J Devine; Cathleen M Walsh; Susan Wang; Dorothy C Gunter; Kathleen L Irwin; Susan DeLisle; Stuart M Berman
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2002-10-18

3.  Positive predictive value of Gen-Probe APTIMA Combo 2 testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae in a population of women with low prevalence of N. gonorrhoeae infection.

Authors:  Matthew R Golden; James P Hughes; Linda E Cles; Karen Crouse; Katherine Gudgel; Jinxin Hu; Paul D Swenson; Walter E Stamm; H Hunter Handsfield
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-10-11       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Comparison of three nucleic acid amplification tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens.

Authors:  Charlotte A Gaydos; Mellisa Theodore; Nicholas Dalesio; Billie Jo Wood; Thomas C Quinn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Use of multiple nucleic acid amplification tests to define the infected-patient "gold standard" in clinical trials of new diagnostic tests for Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  David H Martin; Malanda Nsuami; Julius Schachter; Edward W Hook; Dennis Ferrero; Thomas C Quinn; Charlotte Gaydos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.948

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Confirming the Chlamydia trachomatis status of referred rectal specimens.

Authors:  Sarah Alexander; Iona Martin; Catherine Ison
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 3.519

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.