Literature DB >> 16876759

Responsibility ascriptions and Vision Zero.

Jessica Nihlén Fahlquist1.   

Abstract

Vision Zero is a traffic safety policy that was adopted by the Swedish Parliament in 1997. Similar policies have been adopted in Norway and Denmark. In essence, Vision Zero states that it is unacceptable for anyone to die while using the road transport system. The policy also introduces an explicit distribution of responsibility for traffic safety, in which the system designers are ultimately responsible. In this article, it is argued that the proposed new distribution of responsibility can be better understood if we distinguish between two general types of responsibility ascriptions, namely backward-looking and forward-looking responsibility ascriptions. Both types include some kind of causal responsibility and whereas backward-looking responsibility implies an element of blame, forward-looking responsibility implies potential blame, meaning that in cases where the agent who was ascribed responsibility did not achieve the expected result, we are likely to blame her. Vision Zero still ascribes backward-looking responsibility and to some degree forward-looking responsibility to individuals, but adds the explicit forward-looking responsibility of the system designers.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16876759     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  10 in total

1.  Organizational networks in road safety: Case studies of U.S. Vision Zero cities.

Authors:  Rebecca B Naumann; Stephen Heiny; Kelly R Evenson; Seth LaJeunesse; Jill F Cooper; Sarah Doggett; Stephen W Marshall
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 1.491

2.  A procedural approach to distributing responsibilities in R&D networks.

Authors:  Neelke Doorn
Journal:  Poiesis Prax       Date:  2010-09-16

Review 3.  Comparative Study of Stewardship of Road Traffic Injuries Prevention with a Focus on the Role of Health System; Three Pioneer Countries and Three Similar to Iran.

Authors:  Saber Azami-Aghdash; Homayoun Sadeghi-Bazarghani; Ramin Rezapour; Mahdiyeh Heydari; Naser Derakhshani
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2019-07

4.  Saving lives in road traffic-ethical aspects.

Authors:  Jessica Nihlén Fahlquist
Journal:  Z Gesundh Wiss       Date:  2009-04-09

5.  Moral responsibility, technology, and experiences of the tragic: from Kierkegaard to offshore engineering.

Authors:  Mark Coeckelbergh
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  The problem of many hands: climate change as an example.

Authors:  Ibo van de Poel; Jessica Nihlén Fahlquist; Neelke Doorn; Sjoerd Zwart; Lambèr Royakkers
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Awareness of Vision Zero among United States' road safety professionals.

Authors:  Kelly R Evenson; Seth LaJeunesse; Stephen Heiny
Journal:  Inj Epidemiol       Date:  2018-05-08

8.  A Rawlsian approach to distribute responsibilities in networks.

Authors:  Neelke Doorn
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Responsibility ascriptions in technology development and engineering: three perspectives.

Authors:  Neelke Doorn
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 10.  State-of-the-art review: preventing child and youth pedestrian motor vehicle collisions: critical issues and future directions.

Authors:  Marie-Soleil Cloutier; Emilie Beaulieu; Liraz Fridman; Alison K Macpherson; Brent E Hagel; Andrew William Howard; Tony Churchill; Pamela Fuselli; Colin Macarthur; Linda Rothman
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.399

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.