Literature DB >> 16876421

Structural basis for androgen receptor agonists and antagonists: interaction of SPEED 98-listed chemicals and related compounds with the androgen receptor based on an in vitro reporter gene assay and 3D-QSAR.

Hiroto Tamura1, Yoichi Ishimoto, Tomoko Fujikawa, Hiroaki Aoyama, Hiromichi Yoshikawa, Miki Akamatsu.   

Abstract

The androgen receptor (AR) activity of listed chemicals, so called SPEED 98, by the Ministry of the Environment, Japan, and structurally related chemicals was characterized using MDA-kb2 human breast cancer cells stably expressing an androgen-responsive luciferase reporter gene, MMTV-luc. Since our results suggested that chemicals with diverse chemical structures were capable of disrupting the endocrine systems mediated by AR, a comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) model was developed to analyze the structural requirements necessary to disrupt AR function. A significant CoMFA model with r(2)=0.825 and q(2)=0.332 was developed for AR antagonist activity of 35 pure antagonists excluding procymidone. On the other hand, a good CoMFA model with r(2)=0.983 and q(2)=0.555 was obtained for antagonist activity of 13 chemicals with both agonist and antagonist activities. The steric and electrostatic properties were sufficient to describe the structural requirements for AR antagonist activity. In addition, the structural difference of AR agonists and antagonists was explained based on CoMFA results and the AR-LBD crystal structure. As several ERalpha agonists such as diethylstilbestrol (DES) acted as AR antagonists, the surface area of the AR ligand-binding domain (LBD) was compared with that of the ERalpha-LBD based on their reported crystal structures to analyze how those ligands interact with LBDs. The surface area of AR-LBD was shown to be smaller than that of ERalpha-LBD and therefore compounds with both estrogenic and antiandrogenic activities can fit well into the ERalpha-LBD but may protrude from the AR-LBD. It is likely that this subtle difference of the surface areas of the LBDs determines whether an ERalpha agonist acts as an AR antagonist or an agonist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16876421     DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2006.06.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem        ISSN: 0968-0896            Impact factor:   3.641


  9 in total

Review 1.  Disruption of androgen receptor signaling in males by environmental chemicals.

Authors:  Doug C Luccio-Camelo; Gail S Prins
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.292

2.  First characterization of the endocrine-disrupting potential of indoor gaseous and particulate contamination: comparison with urban outdoor air (France).

Authors:  Lucie Oziol; Fabrice Alliot; Jérémie Botton; Maya Bimbot; Viviane Huteau; Yves Levi; Marc Chevreuil
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  An in silico approach to study the interaction of BHA with selected steroid hormone receptors and investigating it's agonistic and antagonistic properties.

Authors:  Subin Balachandran; R N Binitha
Journal:  In Silico Pharmacol       Date:  2021-01-28

4.  Widely used pesticides with previously unknown endocrine activity revealed as in vitro antiandrogens.

Authors:  Frances Orton; Erika Rosivatz; Martin Scholze; Andreas Kortenkamp
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  In vitro biologic activities of the antimicrobials triclocarban, its analogs, and triclosan in bioassay screens: receptor-based bioassay screens.

Authors:  Ki Chang Ahn; Bin Zhao; Jiangang Chen; Gennady Cherednichenko; Enio Sanmarti; Michael S Denison; Bill Lasley; Isaac N Pessah; Dietmar Kültz; Daniel P Y Chang; Shirley J Gee; Bruce D Hammock
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Screening for potential endocrine disruptors in fish: evidence from structural alerts and in vitro and in vivo toxicological assays.

Authors:  Monika Nendza; Andrea Wenzel; Martin Müller; Geertje Lewin; Nelly Simetska; Frauke Stock; Jürgen Arning
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 5.893

7.  Triclocarban, Triclosan, Bromochlorophene, Chlorophene, and Climbazole Effects on Nuclear Receptors: An in Silico and in Vitro Study.

Authors:  Maša Kenda; Nataša Karas Kuželički; Mitsuru Iida; Hiroyuki Kojima; Marija Sollner Dolenc
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Competitive androgen receptor antagonism as a factor determining the predictability of cumulative antiandrogenic effects of widely used pesticides.

Authors:  Frances Orton; Erika Rosivatz; Martin Scholze; Andreas Kortenkamp
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  From 'omics to otoliths: responses of an estuarine fish to endocrine disrupting compounds across biological scales.

Authors:  Susanne M Brander; Richard E Connon; Guochun He; James A Hobbs; Kelly L Smalling; Swee J Teh; J Wilson White; Inge Werner; Michael S Denison; Gary N Cherr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.