Literature DB >> 16875968

In-stent restenosis and remote coronary lesion progression are coupled in cardiac transplant vasculopathy but not in native coronary artery disease.

Michael Jonas1, James C Fang, John C Wang, Satyendra Giri, Dan Elian, Yedael Har-Zahav, Hung Ly, Philip A Seifert, Jeffrey J Popma, Campbell Rogers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical, angiographic, and histological features of concomitant in-stent restenosis (ISR) and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) progression.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy is a major challenge to long-term success of heart transplantation. Coronary stenting for CAV is hampered by ISR.
METHODS: Quantitative coronary angiography compared late lumen loss (LL) at stented and reference, non-stented segments during 1-year follow-up in post-heart transplant and control atherosclerosis patients. Stented and non-stented arteries with CAV were also obtained post-mortem for immunohistochemical analysis.
RESULTS: In 37 stented lesions (25 patients), 1-year binary restenosis occurred in 37.8%. Patients with ISR had higher long-term cardiac death/myocardial infarction rates than patients without ISR (53.8% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.03). In the same 25 patients, 34 CAV lesions with non-significant obstructions were identified as reference controls. After 1 year, patients who developed ISR also had more control lesion LL (0.78 +/- 0.38 mm vs. 0.39 +/- 0.27 mm, p < 0.006) compared to patients without ISR. In the post-transplant patients, in-stent LL was closely coupled to control segment LL (R(2) = 0.63, p < 0.05). Conversely, in native atherosclerosis patients, ISR and remote disease progression were not correlated. Histological staining of stented and control arteries from CAV patients revealed similar pathologies common to ISR and non-intervened CAV segments.
CONCLUSIONS: Progression of CAV at non-intervened segments and ISR correlate strongly and share common histopathology. Optimized treatment for patients with aggressive CAV needs to address the widespread nature of this disease, even when it presents as an initially focal lesion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16875968     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.01.081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  5 in total

1.  The detection of coronary stiffness in cardiac allografts using MR imaging.

Authors:  Kai Lin; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Kirsi Taimen; Ying Liu; Xiaoming Bi; Debiao Li; James C Carr
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Long-term outcomes of heart transplantation recipients with transplant coronary artery disease who develop in-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Michael S Lee; Richard K Cheng; David E Kandzari; Ajay J Kirtane
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 3.  Diagnosis and management of coronary allograft vasculopathy in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Nathalie Dedieu; Gerald Greil; James Wong; Matthew Fenton; Michael Burch; Tarique Hussain
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2014-12-24

Review 4.  Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: diagnosis, therapy, and prognosis.

Authors:  Boško Skorić; Maja Čikeš; Jana Ljubas Maček; Željko Baričević; Ivan Škorak; Hrvoje Gašparović; Bojan Biočina; Davor Miličić
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.351

5.  Contribution of recipient-derived cells in allograft neointima formation and the response to stent implantation.

Authors:  Xiaoli Ma; Benjamin Hibbert; Dawn White; Richard Seymour; Stewart C Whitman; Edward R O'Brien
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.