Literature DB >> 16875954

Three-dimensional ultrasound volumetric measurements: is the largest number of image planes necessary for outlining the region-of-interest?

Beatrice S F Pang1, Brian C W Kot, Michael Ying.   

Abstract

Volumetric measurement is useful in the clinical practice as it can accurately assess the size of organs and lesions, which aids diagnosis and monitoring of treatment response. This in vitro study was undertaken to evaluate and compare the accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US) volumetric measurements using different numbers of image planes for outlining the region-of-interest. A total of 20 tissue phantoms (10 with regular and 10 with irregular tissue specimens) with known volume (2.2 - 14.7 ml) were constructed. The tissue phantoms were scanned with a commercially-available ultrasound machine in conjunction with a 3D add-on system and the volume of the tissue specimen of the phantoms was measured by manual outlining of the boundaries using different numbers of image plane (16, eight, four and two image planes). Results showed that there was a high accuracy in 3D-US volumetric measurements, when 16 and eight image planes were used (best-fit slope between measured and true volume: 0.9224-0.9761 and 0.9099-0.956, respectively). Results also showed that there was no significant difference in the volume measured with 16 and eight image planes for both phantoms with regular- and irregular-shaped tissue specimens (p > 0.05). The measurement differences between 16 and eight image planes ranged from -0.07 to 0.14 ml for phantoms with regular-shaped tissue and from -0.24 to 0.1 ml for phantoms with irregular-shaped tissue. 3D-US has a high accuracy in volumetric measurements of regular- and irregular-shaped structures. Although highest accuracy in volume measurements was found when 16 image planes were used, similar level of accuracy can be achieved with eight image planes but the measurement time can be reduced by 50%. Therefore, in 3D-US volumetric measurements, the largest number of image planes may not be necessary for outlining the region-of-interest.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16875954     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  4 in total

1.  Quantitative assessment of gestational sac shape: the gestational sac shape score.

Authors:  R L Deter; J Li; W Lee; S Liu; R Romero
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  Comparison between different imaging techniques in the evaluation of malignant breast lesions: can 3D ultrasound be useful?

Authors:  Paola Clauser; Viviana Londero; Giuseppe Como; Rossano Girometti; Massimo Bazzocchi; Chiara Zuiani
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Assessment of renal volume by three-dimensional ultrasonography in pregnant bitches: an experimental study using virtual organ computer-aided analysis.

Authors:  Débora Sartori Mendonça; Rafael Fontoura Fernandes Moron; André Luiz Louzada Maldonado; Edward Araujo Júnior; Luciano Marcondes Machado Nardozza; Antonio Fernandes Moron
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Therapeutic response assessment using 3D ultrasound for hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer: Application of a personalized, 3D-printed tumor model using CT images.

Authors:  Ye Ra Choi; Jung Hoon Kim; Sang Joon Park; Bo Yun Hur; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.