Literature DB >> 16875937

Near-triploidy and near-tetraploidy in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: association with B-lineage blast cells carrying the ETV6-RUNX1 fusion, T-lineage immunophenotype, and favorable outcome.

Susana C Raimondi1, Yinmei Zhou, Sheila A Shurtleff, Jeffrey E Rubnitz, Ching-Hon Pui, Frederick G Behm.   

Abstract

The prognostic significance of near-triploidy (68-80 chromosomes) and near-tetraploidy (>80 chromosomes) in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is unclear. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated the incidence of and outcome associated with these subtypes of ALL. In 620 children with ALL diagnosed between 1988 and 1999, the leukemic cells were near-triploid (DNA index, 1.50-1.73) in 4 and near-tetraploid (DNA index, 1.79-2.28) in 14. Of 15 patients with B-lineage ALL, 11 (73.3%) had an ETV6-RUNX1 (previously TEL-AML1 and then ETV6-CBFA2) fusion. No differences in age (P = 0.99), leukocyte count (P = 0.99), or immunophenotype (P = 0.99) were observed between patients with near-triploidy and those with near-tetraploidy. Patients with near-triploidy or near-tetraploidy were more likely than those with high-hyperdiploidy (51-67 chromosomes) (n = 159) to be female (P = 0.05) and have T-lineage ALL (P = 0.02), L2 morphology (P < 0.0001), or the ETV6-RUNX1 fusion (P < 0.0001). The median follow-up period was 10.4 years. The 5-year event-free survival estimates (+/- SE) were 75% +/- 19% for patients with near-triploidy, 93% +/- 7% for those with near-tetraploidy, and 84% +/- 3% for those with high-hyperdiploidy. Although near-triploidy and near-tetraploidy are biologically different from high-hyperdiploidy, the favorable outcomes of patients with any one of these abnormalities suggest that patients with B-lineage ALL and a DNA index >or= 1.16 can be included in the low-risk arm of treatment protocols. We cannot make similar recommendations for patients with T-lineage ALL because of the small number of cases (n = 3) in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16875937     DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2006.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet        ISSN: 0165-4608


  6 in total

1.  An unusual T-cell childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia harboring a yet unreported near-tetraploid karyotype.

Authors:  Daniela Rn Garcia; Samarth Bhatt; Marina Manvelyan; Mariana T de Souza; Renata Binato; Thais F Aguiar; Eliana Abdelhay; Maria Luiza M Silva
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 2.  Emerging technologies in paediatric leukaemia.

Authors:  Amanda Dixon-McIver
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2015-04

3.  ETV6/RUNX1 abrogates mitotic checkpoint function and targets its key player MAD2L1.

Authors:  G Krapf; U Kaindl; A Kilbey; G Fuka; A Inthal; R Joas; G Mann; J C Neil; O A Haas; E R Panzer-Grümayer
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  Histone methyltransferase EZH2 induces Akt-dependent genomic instability and BRCA1 inhibition in breast cancer.

Authors:  Maria E Gonzalez; Matthew L DuPrie; Heather Krueger; Sofia D Merajver; Alejandra C Ventura; Kathy A Toy; Celina G Kleer
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  Prognostification of ALL by Cytogenetics.

Authors:  Ansar Hakeem; Aejaz Aziz Shiekh; Gull Mohd Bhat; A R Lone
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 0.900

6.  Flow Cytometric DNA Ploidy Analysis in Haemato-Lymphoid Neoplasms: An Analysis of 132 Cases.

Authors:  Nishit Gupta; Aditi Mittal; Tina Dadu; Dharma Choudhary; Anil Handoo
Journal:  Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res       Date:  2022-01-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.