Literature DB >> 16875655

Medical student evaluation of teaching quality between obstetrics and gynecology residents and faculty as clinical preceptors in ambulatory gynecology.

Natasha R Johnson1, Jie Chen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to compare teaching quality between obstetrics/gynecology resident and faculty preceptors in ambulatory gynecology as determined by medical student evaluation. STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective assessment of medical student evaluations of resident and faculty preceptors in ambulatory gynecology was conducted at Brigham and Women's Hospital. Forty-eight third-year medical students evaluated preceptors on 15 teaching quality items and recorded their clinical experience during their obstetrics/gynecology clerkship from July 2004 to June 2005 for a total of 138 evaluations.
RESULTS: Faculty scores were statistically higher than resident scores on 4 of the 15 teaching quality items; acting as an appropriate clinical role model, emphasizing evidence-based learning, being enthusiastic about teaching and patient care (P < .05). Students performed significantly more Papanicolaou tests and pelvic and breast examinations during ambulatory sessions with residents than with faculty (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Residents and faculty contribute important and different aspects of teaching experiences for medical students in ambulatory gynecology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16875655     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  5 in total

1.  Effect of medical students' experiences with residents as teachers on clerkship assessment.

Authors:  Anhtuan Huynh; Jennifer Savitski; Melissa Kirven; Jennifer Godwin; Karen M Gil
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2011-09

2.  Systematic evaluation of the teaching qualities of Obstetrics and Gynecology faculty: reliability and validity of the SETQ tools.

Authors:  Renée van der Leeuw; Kiki Lombarts; Maas Jan Heineman; Onyebuchi Arah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Confounding factors in using upward feedback to assess the quality of medical training: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anli Yue Zhou; Paul Baker
Journal:  J Educ Eval Health Prof       Date:  2014-08-13

4.  Measuring and assessing the competencies of preceptors in health professions: a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Andrew D Bartlett; Irene S Um; Edward J Luca; Ines Krass; Carl R Schneider
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Medical student and resident perceptions when working together in resident continuity clinics.

Authors:  Tina Chaalan; Deborah Landis Lewis; Kelly O'Connor; Bryan Popp; Maya Hammoud; Erika L Mowers
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2020-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.