Literature DB >> 16875467

Topology of splicing and snRNP biogenesis in dinoflagellate nuclei.

Elsa Alverca1, Susana Franca, Susana Moreno Díaz de la Espina.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Dinoflagellates are protists that are hypothesized to have experienced a secondary loss of histones. Amongst eukaryotes, they are unique in lacking these proteins. To date, information on the mechanisms involving remodelling, transcription and splicing of their chromatin is limited. Dinoflagellate genes lack TATA boxes and downstream polyadenylation sites and particular linear arrangements. They have an alpha-amanitin-sensitive RNA polymerase, specific transcription factors and regulators, and both transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. Dinoflagellates produce either polycistronic or discrete mRNAs, and have conserved snRNAs (small nuclear RNAs), indicating that their genes are spliced.
RESULTS: Five representative dinoflagellate species (Amphidinium carterae, Akashiwo sanguinea, Alexandrium lusitanicum, Alexandrium fundyense and Prorocentrum micans), which show diversity in their DNA content, nuclear organization and taxonomic position, were investigated. The nuclear distribution and ultrastructural organization of splicing and snRNP (small nuclear ribonucleoprotein) biogenesis were determined by fluorescent and electron microscopy immunolabelling with Y12 sera [recognizing the sDMA (symmetrical dimethylarginine) domain of Sm and other nuclear proteins], anti-p105-PANA [proliferation-associated nuclear antigen; a marker of IGs (interchromatin granules)] and anti-DNA antibodies. In parallel, ultrastructural analysis, including cytochemical staining for RNA, phosphorylated proteins and DNA, was carried out. Splicing factors were distributed in a diffuse perichromosomal layer containing perichromatin granules and fibrils that co-localized with the decondensed peripheral DNA loops, but not with the main chromosome body. Interchromosomal domains with IGs and Cajal-like bodies were also detected.
CONCLUSIONS: Dinoflagellates are rather dissimilar to other eukaryotes in their genomes, their mechanisms of gene expression and their chromosome ultrastructure. However, they share common splicing nuclear domains and snRNP biogenesis with that of other eukaryotes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16875467     DOI: 10.1042/BC20050083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cell        ISSN: 0248-4900            Impact factor:   4.458


  7 in total

1.  Spliced leader RNA trans-splicing in dinoflagellates.

Authors:  Huan Zhang; Yubo Hou; Lilibeth Miranda; David A Campbell; Nancy R Sturm; Terry Gaasterland; Senjie Lin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Origin of the cell nucleus, mitosis and sex: roles of intracellular coevolution.

Authors:  Thomas Cavalier-Smith
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 4.540

3.  Comparative gene expression in toxic versus non-toxic strains of the marine dinoflagellate Alexandrium minutum.

Authors:  Ines Yang; Uwe John; Sára Beszteri; Gernot Glöckner; Bernd Krock; Alexander Goesmann; Allan D Cembella
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  snRNP: Rich Nuclear Bodies in Hyacinthus orientalis L. Microspores and Developing Pollen Cells.

Authors:  K Zienkiewicz; E Bednarska
Journal:  Int J Cell Biol       Date:  2009-06-25

5.  Glomerulosomes: morphologically distinct nuclear organelles of unknown nature.

Authors:  Dmitry S Bogolyubov; Lyudmila V Chistyakova; Andrew V Goodkov
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 6.  The Biochemistry and Evolution of the Dinoflagellate Nucleus.

Authors:  Sebastian G Gornik; Ian Hu; Imen Lassadi; Ross F Waller
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2019-08-08

Review 7.  Transcription and Maturation of mRNA in Dinoflagellates.

Authors:  Sougata Roy; David Morse
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2013-11-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.