Literature DB >> 16875224

Distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure analysis of 50 normal-hearing humans.

Karen Reuter1, Dorte Hammershøi.   

Abstract

When distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) are measured with a high-frequency resolution, the DPOAE shows quasi-periodic variations across frequency, called DPOAE fine structure. In this study the DPOAE fine structure is determined for 50 normal-hearing humans using fixed primary levels of L1/L2 = 65/45 dB. An algorithm is developed, which characterizes the fine structure ripples in terms of three parameters: ripple spacing, ripple height, and ripple prevalence. The characteristic patterns of fine structure can be found in the DPOAE of all subjects, though the DPOAE fine structure characteristics are individual and vary from subject to subject. On average the ripple spacing decreases with increasing frequency from 1/8 oct at 1 kHz to 3/32 oct at 5 kHz. The ripple prevalence is two to three ripples per 1/3 oct, and ripple heights of up to 32 dB could be detected. The 50 normal-hearing subjects were divided into two groups, the subjects of group A having slightly better hearing levels than subjects of group B. The subjects of group A have significantly higher DPOAE levels. The overall prevalence of fine structure ripples do not differ between the two groups, but are higher and narrower for subjects of group B than for group A.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16875224     DOI: 10.1121/1.2205130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Optimizing swept-tone protocols for recording distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in adults and newborns.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: cochlear-source contributions and clinical test performance.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Darcia M Dierking; Hongyang Tan; Connie Converse; Elizabeth Kennedy; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Considering distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure in measurements of the medial olivocochlear reflex.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Srikanta K Mishra; Tracy L Williams
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission phase and component analysis in human newborns.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Contralateral acoustic stimulation alters the magnitude and phase of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Ryan Deeter; Rebekah Abel; Lauren Calandruccio; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Characteristics of the 2f(1)-f(2) distortion product otoacoustic emission in a normal hearing population.

Authors:  Gayla L Poling; Jonathan H Siegel; Jungmee Lee; Jungwha Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emission Measured Below 300 Hz in Normal-Hearing Human Subjects.

Authors:  Anders T Christensen; Rodrigo Ordoñez; Dorte Hammershøi
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-21

8.  The relationship between MOC reflex and masked threshold.

Authors:  Angela Garinis; Lynne Werner; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: its dependence on age and hearing threshold and clinical implications.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wagner; Peter K Plinkert; Reinhard Vonthein; Stefan K Plontke
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.503

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.