| Literature DB >> 1687507 |
Abstract
Social, economic and operational research has already contributed to the growing global awareness of the neglected burden of tuberculosis on individuals, families and communities. These studies have also illustrated that short-course chemotherapy for smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis is a highly cost-effective tool for combatting tuberculosis. In the present work, the author examines the costs and effectiveness of the national tuberculosis programmes in Malawi, Mozambique and Tanzania. Chemotherapy for smear-positive tuberculosis is found to be among the most cost-effective health interventions known, costing 1-4 US dollars per year of life saved. In all situations, short-course chemotherapy is found to be more cost-effective than standard 12-month chemotherapy. General conclusions about the role of hospitalization are difficult to make; its cost-effectiveness depends on local patterns of compliance and the cost of hospitalization. Because more than three-quarters of the benefits of chemotherapy for smear-positive tuberculosis are due to transmission reduction, treating HIV sero-positives, smear-positives is probably cost-effective.Entities:
Keywords: Africa; Africa South Of The Sahara; Age Factors; Cost Effectiveness; Demographic Factors; Developing Countries; Diseases; Eastern Africa; Economic Factors; English Speaking Africa; Evaluation; Evaluation Indexes; Infections; Malawi; Mozambique; Operations Research; Organization And Administration; Population; Population Characteristics; Portuguese Speaking Africa; Quantitative Evaluation; Research And Development; Tanzania; Technology; Treatment--cost; Tuberculosis--women
Mesh:
Year: 1991 PMID: 1687507
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bull Int Union Tuberc Lung Dis ISSN: 1011-789X