Literature DB >> 16874865

Computed tomographic differentiation between alcoholic and gallstone pancreatitis: Significance of distribution of infiltration or fluid collection.

Young-Sun Kim1, Yongsoo Kim, Sung-Kyu Kim, Hyunchul Rhim.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the usefulness of various computed tomography (CT) findings including distribution of infiltration or fluid collection in differentiating the major etiologies of acute pancreatitis.
METHODS: We reviewed 75 relatively severe cases of acute pancreatitis of alcoholic (n = 43) or biliary stone (n = 32) etiology having infiltration or fluid collection on CT. We compared the pancreatic size, CT grading, presence or absence of biliary calculi, and dilatation of pancreatic or bile duct. We also evaluated degree and the distribution of infiltration and fluid collection in each group.
RESULTS: The sizes of pancreas were not different between alcohol group and stone group. Alcohol group showed higher CT grading than stone group (P < 0.05). Presence of biliary stone and duct dilatation was statistically significant in differentiating etiology (P < 0.05). Alcohol group showed significantly prominent peripancreatic pathology than stone group only in left peritoneal compartment (P = 0.020).
CONCLUSION: Alcoholic pancreatitis tends to form more prominent peripancreatic changes than gallstone pancreatitis in relatively severe cases. This is evident on the anterior aspect of left abdomen. Although clinical history and some CT findings usually are a major determinant of the etiology, this pattern of peripancreatic pathology may have an ancillary role in determining the etiologies of acute pancreatitis in the equivocal cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16874865      PMCID: PMC4125640          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i28.4524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  12 in total

1.  Which etiology causes the most severe acute pancreatitis?

Authors:  P G Lankisch; C Assmus; D Pflichthofer; K Struckmann; D Lehnick
Journal:  Int J Pancreatol       Date:  1999-10

2.  Controlled trial of urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy versus conservative treatment for acute pancreatitis due to gallstones.

Authors:  J P Neoptolemos; D L Carr-Locke; N J London; I A Bailey; D James; D P Fossard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-10-29       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  A scoring system for early differentiation of the etiology of acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  D Stimac; T Lenac; Z Marusić
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.423

4.  The biochemical detection of biliary etiology of acute pancreatitis on admission: a revisit in the modern era of biliary imaging.

Authors:  B J Ammori; B Boreham; P Lewis; S A Roberts
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.327

5.  Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis.

Authors:  E J Balthazar; D L Robinson; A J Megibow; J H Ranson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Severity of acute pancreatitis: relationship with etiology, sex and age.

Authors:  R Pezzilli; P Billi; A M Morselli-Labate
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct

7.  The admission serum lipase:amylase ratio differentiates alcoholic from nonalcoholic acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  S M Tenner; W Steinberg
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  [Sonography in acute pancreatitis--diagnosis, assessment of etiology and evaluating prognosis].

Authors:  J Schölmerich; T Johannesson; G Brobmann; B Wimmer; B Thiedemann; V Gross; W Gerok; E H Farthmann
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 6.548

9.  Acute pancreatitis: prognostic value of CT.

Authors:  E J Balthazar; J H Ranson; D P Naidich; A J Megibow; R Caccavale; M M Cooper
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  CT of fluid collections associated with pancreatitis.

Authors:  S S Siegelman; B E Copeland; G P Saba; J L Cameron; R C Sanders; E A Zerhouni
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of clinical course and outcome of acute pancreatitis according to the two main etiologies: alcohol and gallstone.

Authors:  Joon Hyun Cho; Tae Nyeun Kim; Sung Bum Kim
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Analysis of Factors Associated with the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis according to Etiology.

Authors:  Dae Bum Kim; Woo Chul Chung; Ji Min Lee; Kang-Moon Lee; Jung Hwan Oh; Eun Jung Jeon
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 2.260

3.  Comparative study of the outcome between alcohol and gallstone pancreatitis in a high-volume tertiary care center.

Authors:  Jayanta Samanta; Narendra Dhaka; Pankaj Gupta; Anupam K Singh; Thakur D Yadav; Vikas Gupta; Saroj K Sinha; Rakesh Kochhar
Journal:  JGH Open       Date:  2019-03-26

4.  Computed tomography characteristics of acute pancreatitis based on different etiologies at different onset times: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Juanjuan Du; Ju Zhang; Xinyu Zhang; Rui Jiang; Quanshui Fu; Guoqing Yang; Hui Fan; Mengyue Tang; Tianwu Chen; Xinghui Li; Xiaoming Zhang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.