Literature DB >> 16874798

Assessment of coxib utilization by rheumatologists for nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug gastroprotection prior to the coxib market withdrawals.

Jeffrey D Greenberg1, Clifton O Bingham, Steven B Abramson, George Reed, Mitsumasa Kishimoto, Kim Hinkle, Joel Kremer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitor (coxib) utilization by rheumatologists for patients receiving nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) prior to the coxib market withdrawals.
METHODS: A prospective study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis enrolled in the Consortium of Rheumatology Researchers of North America registry was performed.
RESULTS: Of 1,833 patients receiving prescription NSAIDs, 1,380 (75.3%) received gastroprotection, defined as either coxib monotherapy and/or gastroprotective agent (GPA) cotherapy, and 1,207 (65.8%) received coxibs. The distribution of gastroprotective strategies included 860 (46.9%) patients who were prescribed coxib monotherapy, 347 (18.9%) prescribed dual coxib plus GPA cotherapy, 173 (9.4%) prescribed a nonselective NSAID (NS-NSAID) plus GPA cotherapy, and 453 (24.7%) prescribed an NS-NSAID without GPA cotherapy. For patients with 0, 1, and > or =2 identifiable gastrointestinal (GI) risk factors, coxib prescribing rates as a proportion of NSAID agents were 64.1%, 66.4%, and 68.6%, respectively; among dual aspirin/NSAID users, coxib prescribing rates were 66.2%, 78.3%, and 68.5% of NSAID prescriptions, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The majority of NSAID users were prescribed a gastroprotective strategy, primarily attributable to coxib utilization. Coxib utilization rates were consistently high across all levels of GI risk, including patients without identifiable risk factors. These data indicate that rheumatologists broadly adopted the coxib class of NSAIDs in a nonselective manner with respect to underlying GI risk and concomitant aspirin use. As novel therapeutic classes are introduced, early evaluation of prescribing patterns using arthritis registries can determine the appropriateness of prescribing patterns and may improve patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16874798     DOI: 10.1002/art.22095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  4 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for conducting pharmaceutical budget impact analyses for submission to public drug plans in Canada.

Authors:  Deborah A Marshall; Patrick R Douglas; Michael F Drummond; George W Torrance; Stuart Macleod; Orlando Manti; Lokanadha Cheruvu; Ron Corvari
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Predictors of bone density testing in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  J Aizer; G Reed; A Onofrei; M J Harrison
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2008-12-21       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  Tox-database.net: a curated resource for data describing chemical triggered in vitro cardiac ion channels inhibition.

Authors:  Sebastian Polak; Barbara Wiśniowska; Anna Glinka; Miłosz Polak
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 2.483

4.  "Design characteristics of the CORRONA CERTAIN study: a comparative effectiveness study of biologic agents for rheumatoid arthritis patients".

Authors:  Dimitrios A Pappas; Joel M Kremer; George Reed; Jeffrey D Greenberg; Jeffrey R Curtis
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.